International
Big tech election interference?
For people who care about fairness and democracy it feels like they just discovered the refs are cheating for the other team.
Videos of people questioning their Amazon Alexa about America’s presidential candidates are going viral. The videos show people asking “Why should I vote for former President Donald Trump/Vice President Kamala Harris?”
The difference in answers coming from big tech behemoth Amazon is highly disturbing proof the field is tilted.
Watch:
“Alexa, why should I vote for Donald Trump?”
ALEXA: I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party or a specific candidate
UNLESS IT’S KAMALA HARRIS‼️
LISTEN & SHARE 🚨👇🏼 pic.twitter.com/UlDSsGBFJY
— TONY™ (@TONYxTWO) September 3, 2024
Comment streams indicate Amazon has “fixed” this glaring glitch. But it was certainly not an isolated incident. Here are a string of videos from people asking similar questions and getting one-way election direction from Amazon.
Amazon's Alexa gives a list of reasons to vote for Kamala, won't do it for Trump: pic.twitter.com/xdAfouSPUd
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 3, 2024
Four years after the 2020 election the media is only recently starting to admit big tech teamed up with the authorities to interfere by denying the Biden laptop videos revealing widespread criminality by the Biden family.
When I was CEO of Parler, I was pressured to take down the Hunter Biden laptop story. I refused, and my company was deplatformed. Now, the censors are going even further, trying to take away Telegram CEO Pavel Durov's freedom. This has to stop! #freespeech pic.twitter.com/Rvb2bwMgfp
— John Matze 💙 (@john_matze) August 30, 2024
With election 2024 on the doorstep, here’s big tech again, seemingly choosing sides and tilting the field. In 2024 big tech seems to have learned there are no consequences for election interference. These videos are also another in a long line of opportunities for the regular media to take a stand for fairness, freedom and democracy. Does anyone think that will happen?
DEI
University System of Georgia to ban DEI, commit to neutrality, teach Constitution
By
“The basis and determining factor” for employment will be “that the individual possesses the requisite knowledge, skills, and abilities associated with the role, and is believed to have the ability to successfully perform the essential functions, responsibilities, and duties associated with the position for which the individual is being considered.”
The University System of Georgia’s Board of Regents has recommended a number of new and revised policies for its institutions, such as a commitment to institutional neutrality, the prohibiting of DEI tactics, and a mandatory education in America’s founding documents.
The University System of Georgia (USG) is made up of Georgia’s 26 public colleges and universities as well as Georgia Archives and the Georgia Public Library Service.
“USG institutions shall remain neutral on social and political issues unless such an issue is directly related to the institution’s core mission,” the board’s proposed revisions read.
“Ideological tests, affirmations, and oaths, including diversity statements,” will be banned from admissions processes and decisions, employment processes and decisions, and institution orientation and training for both students and employees.
“No applicant for admission shall be asked to or required to affirmatively ascribe to or opine about political beliefs, affiliations, ideals, or principles, as a condition for admission,” the new policy states.
Additionally, USG will hire based on a person’s qualifications and ability.
“The basis and determining factor” for employment will be “that the individual possesses the requisite knowledge, skills, and abilities associated with the role, and is believed to have the ability to successfully perform the essential functions, responsibilities, and duties associated with the position for which the individual is being considered.”
Beginning in the 2025-2026 academic year, the school’s civic instruction will require students to study founding American documents among other things.
USG students will learn from the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights, the Articles of Confederation, the Federalist Papers, the Gettysburg Address, the Emancipation Proclamation, and Martin Luther King Jr.’s Letter from Birmingham Jail, as well as the Georgia Constitution and Bill of Rights.
When reached for comment, the Board of Regents told The Center Square that “these proposed updates strengthen USG’s academic communities.”
The recommended policies allow a campus environment “where people have the freedom to share their thoughts and learn from one another through objective scholarship and inquiry,” and “reflect an unyielding obligation to protect freedom, provide quality higher education and promote student success,” the board said.
The board told The Center Square that it proposed strengthening “the requirements for civics instruction” with the inclusion of “foundational primary sources” because of higher education’s duty to students.
Colleges and universities “must prepare [students] to be contributing members of society and to understand the ideals of freedom and democracy that make America so exceptional,” the board said.
As for ditching DEI, the board explained that “equal opportunity and decisions based on merit are fundamental values of USG.”
“The proposed revisions among other things would make clear that student admissions and employee hiring should be based on a person’s qualifications, not his or her beliefs,” the board said.
The Board of Regents also said it wants to “ensure [its] institutions remain neutral on social and political issues while modeling what it looks like to promote viewpoint diversity, create campus cultures where students and faculty engage in civil discourse, and the open exchange of ideas is the norm.”
USG’s Board of Regents recently urged the NCAA to ban transgender-identifying men from participating in women’s sports, in line with the NAIA rules, The Center Square previously reported.
Censorship Industrial Complex
G20’s Online Speech Clampdown Calls Set To Ignite Free Speech Fears
G20 leaders convened in Rio de Janeiro have called for enhanced responsibility and transparency from digital platforms to tackle the growing challenges of “misinformation,” “disinformation,” “hate speech,” and others on their long list of supposed online “harms.”
The summit’s final declaration highlighted the transformative role of digital platforms in global communication but noted the adverse effects of digital content’s rapid spread. It called for increased accountability from platforms to manage speech, which should raise eyebrows among free speech advocates who’ve heard all this before.
We obtained a copy of the declaration for you here.
During the summit, the leaders highlighted the transformative impact of digital platforms in communication and information dissemination across the globe. However, they also alleged negative ramifications of unchecked digital spaces, where “harmful” content can proliferate at an unprecedented pace and scale.
In response, the G20’s final declaration underscored the critical role of digital platforms in ensuring their ecosystems do not become breeding grounds for speech they don’t like.
The declaration states: “We recognize that digital platforms have reshaped the digital ecosystem and online interactions by amplifying information dissemination and facilitating communication within and across geographical boundaries. However, the digitization of the information realm and the accelerated evolution of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), has dramatically impacted the speed, scale, and reach of misinformation and disinformation, hate speech, and other forms of online harms.”
The G20 goes on to say that it emphasizes the “need for digital platforms’ transparency and responsibility in line with relevant policies and applicable legal frameworks and will work with platforms and relevant stakeholders in this regard.”
The declaration even says more measures need to be taken to control what it says is the spread of online misogyny and the need to combat it “online and offline.”
-
Business2 days ago
Taxpayer watchdog calls Trudeau ‘out of touch’ for prioritizing ‘climate change’ while families struggle
-
Daily Caller2 days ago
Chinese Agents Can Now Access Every American’s Phone Calls And Texts, GOP Senator Warns
-
Environment2 days ago
Climate Scientists declare the climate “emergency” is at an end
-
conflict2 days ago
The West Is Playing With Fire In Ukraine
-
Business17 hours ago
A Rush to the Exits: It’s Not Just Immigration, Canada Has an Emigration Crisis
-
Alberta12 hours ago
Passenger rail experts from across the world to inform Alberta’s Passenger Rail Master Plan
-
Alberta18 hours ago
REPORT: Alberta municipalities hit with $37 million carbon tax tab in 2023
-
Business13 hours ago
The Health Research Funding Scandal Costing Canadians Billions is Parading in Plain View