Alberta
Alberta First needs 270,000 Albertans to sign petition, initiate referendum on Pension Plan
New release from Alberta First
The cost of running the CPP has increased a thousandfold since 2000. In 2000, costs were 4 million dollars; currently, they amount to 4.4 billion dollars.
Every Albertan can play a part in ensuring prosperity for generations to come.The Alberta First Pension Plan team strongly believes that the Alberta Pension Plan is a sensible choice. This belief comes after extensive discussions with thousands of Albertans and a deep understanding of the law and the facts. Our responsibility is to ensure that this understanding is shared with every voting Albertan. The Alberta Pension Plan has been a topic of debate, with supporters and opponents expressing their opinions on its potential impact. As a team of dedicated Albertans, the Alberta First Pension Plan team, guided by numerous esteemed professionals across the province, is committed to providing the facts to all Albertans. We support the idea that establishing an Alberta Pension Plan would give Alberta more control and independence over managing the investment funds and the ability to cut the high management fees Canadians pay to the CPP Investment Board. It has the potential to offer greater benefits and lower contributions than the existing Canada Pension Plan. An Alberta Pension Plan would address the unique needs of Albertans and contribute to economic development and financial security. To find reports, videos, and information on the Alberta Pension Plan, you can CLICK HERE. Many who oppose it are worried about the costs and complexities of setting up a separate pension plan for Alberta. They fear higher fees and lower benefits for Albertans than the Canada Pension Plan. Additionally, they are concerned about the economic impact and, most importantly, the Alberta government’s potential interference in fund management. It is essential to consider both perspectives when comparing the Alberta Pension Plan with the Canada Pension Plan. This allows Albertans to make an informed decision. While there are valid concerns, citizens can address these by staying actively involved and acting as watchdogs over the provincial government. Here are the top three concerns regarding moving to an Alberta Pension Plan: “Higher costs to manage an Alberta Penson Plan” Alberta is home to some of the most competent individuals in the financial industry. To ensure cost-effective management, Alberta could consider adopting several models from around the world. The cost of running the CPP has increased a thousandfold since 2000. In 2000, costs were 4 million dollars; currently, they amount to 4.4 billion dollars. “My benefits will be negatively affected.” As per the CPP Act, Section 3 (1), residents of Alberta must receive, at minimum, the same benefit they received under the CPP for a province to withdraw and create their own. “The Alberta Government will mismanage the fund.” The fear of the government mismanaging money is a valid concern. As Albertans, we must ensure that the Alberta Pension Plan is managed independently, with the sole mandate of maximizing profit and mitigating risk to the fund. We must be vocal and involved in the decision-making process to shape the future of our pension system. What do we need to do?Our first step is to initiate a referendum. The Alberta Government will only proceed with the referendum if there is significant support from Albertans.
This will mark an outstanding achievement, demonstrating Albertans’ determination to secure a prosperous future for all generations.
OUR PENSION! OUR CHOICE! |
|
|
|
Alberta
Jasper rebuilding delayed as province waits for federal and local government approvals
From Jason Nixon, MLA for Rimbey-Rocky Mountain House-Sundre and Alberta’s Minister of Seniors, Community and Social Services on X
Alberta’s government immediately took action to support those who lost their homes in the Jasper wildfire. We were on track to deliver 250 homes, but Alberta cannot do this without land. It’s been radio silence from Ottawa since Premier Danielle Smith sent a letter to the Prime Minister nearly a month ago. Read my full statement
Alberta
Before Trudeau Blames Alberta, Perhaps He Should Look in the Mirror
From EnergyNow.ca
There has been a lot of talk about how Premier Danielle Smith did not sign a statement of support with the Government of Canada regarding a unified response to any tariff action taken by incoming President of the United States, Donald Trump.
Trudeau singles out Alberta premier for not putting ‘Canada first’ in break with other provinces
Thanks for reading William’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
While it is easy to throw stones at Premier Smith and call her actions one of selfishness, placing the interests of Alberta ahead of Canada, I think there are a number of reasons why one could reply that she was well within her right to act as she did. Over the last decade, Trudeau has gone out of his way to vilify the oil and gas industry, through his continual bad mouthing of the industry as being antiquated, and implementing policies that ensured that capital flight from the space accelerated, infrastructure projects were cancelled and massive levels of uncertainty were overlaid on the investment landscape going forward. Despite all this, the oil and gas sector still remains one of the most important economic contributors to the economy and is the largest component of exports from Canada to the United States, and it isn’t even close.
The Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC)
The ironic thing of all this? To get oil to the refineries in the east, you need to IMPORT it by pipeline from the United States or primarily by ship to Quebec and New Brunswick. Had the Energy East Pipeline been built, Canadian refineries could have had Canadian domiciled product to satiate them. Moreover, had Northern Gateway been built, we would have diversified our client list beyond the United States. Sure, the Trans Mountain Pipeline was built, at extraordinary cost and timelines, and some “credit” is due to the Government getting it done, but the proof is in the current landscape that we operate in.
Now, coming back to the beginning. Why do I think Trudeau should look in the mirror before throwing rocks at Premier Smith? I come back to 2015 when Trudeau said Canada is the world’s “first postnational state” and that “there is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada.” He has gone about taking away what many of us grew up with, namely a sense of Canadian identity, and tried to replace that with shame and no collective identity. What is a post nation state you may ask? Post-nationalism or non-nationalism is the process or trend by which nation states and national identities lose their importance relative to cross-nation and self-organized or supranational and global entities as well as local entities.
So, is it any wonder that people are starting to question what is Canadian any more? At a time when Canada is under significant threat, the irony that Alberta likely represents the best tool in this tools (Trudeau) economic toolbox, is wildly ironic. As they say, karma’s a bitch.
Thanks for reading William’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support for his work.
-
Business20 hours ago
Trump Talks To China Leader Xi Jinping About Several Topics As President-Elect Readies Himself For White House
-
Daily Caller2 days ago
‘This Is So Disgusting’: Joe Rogan Unloads On Gavin Newsom For ‘Creepy’ Behavior In Front Of Wildfire Wreckage
-
Alberta20 hours ago
Before Trudeau Blames Alberta, Perhaps He Should Look in the Mirror
-
Brownstone Institute2 days ago
The Cure for Vaccine Skepticism
-
Daily Caller13 hours ago
Sweeping Deportations to Begin in Chicago Day After Inauguration
-
Brownstone Institute1 day ago
It’s Time to Retire ‘Misinformation’
-
Business20 hours ago
Greenland Is A Strategic Goldmine
-
DEI2 days ago
Biden FBI shut down diversity office before Trump administration could review it