Connect with us

COVID-19

Bombshell long-term study of Pfizer, Moderna COVID shots shows ‘self-assembling nanostructures’

Published

13 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Emily Mangiaracina

Researchers have observed with a microscope the self-assembly of nanostructures in the mRNA COVID shots, as well as toxic effects on blood cells from all of the COVID shots, and potential detox mechanisms.

Researchers in Korea have observed what appear to be “self-assembling,” “synthetic” nanostructures such as spirals and tubes that form within the contents of the COVID Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots over the course of months.

Dr. Young Mi Lee and Dr. Daniel Broudy, co-authors of the recently published study of these “artificial constructions,” suggested that their main findings were the direct observation of both “self-assembling entities… of many different shapes,” and of “cellular toxicity” triggered by the COVID shots, “especially” on blood and sperm cells. 

In a Korean laboratory, using flu vaccine and normal saline as controls, the researchers incubated Pfizer and Moderna COVID injectables in various fluids, including distilled water, saline, blood plasma, and semen. AstraZeneca and Novavax COVID vaccines were also studied, but they did not develop the “self-assembled” structures seen in the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots.

While no floating particles were observed in the saline control, and only a few floating particles were observed in the flu, Novavax, and AstraZeneca vaccines, “many” entities were seen in “all residual and new” Pfizer injectables. About 30% of these reportedly had a “worm-like shape,” and these combined with “rods, discs, and crystal-like mixtures.” When incubated at body temperature for up to two days, these entities developed into other shapes, including “spheres” and “elongated tube-like objects.”

Each of the Moderna shot contents, by contrast, had “a greater number of particles” and “more artificial moving structures,” including coils and beaded chains.

Over the course of a few weeks, “2 dimensional rectangular shaped structures” appeared at the bottom of the dish in which the COVID Pfizer and Moderna shots were incubated, from which three-dimensional structures seemed to emerge, and then were “dislodged” from the bottom of the dish and rose into the upper fluid layer.

“Amazing self-assembling structures of great diversity became visible by about the fifth week of incubation. They consisted ultimately of ribbons, coils and filament-like structures,” Lee and Broudy wrote.

These remarkable nanostructures, which were studied under a microscope at up to 400x magnification for over a year, have not been precisely identified but resemble objects within the COVID shots found by other doctors.

For example, in 2022, Australian Dr. David Nixon found “self-assembling” angular structures within the COVID shots, as well as “wires” with frayed edges, around which apparent “chips” often appeared. He observed similar “wires” in the blood of the vaccinated, and interestingly, one of these “frayed wires,” around which blood cells clumped, resembles the shape of what Lee and Broudy described as a “tripod-like, striated filament” found in the Pfizer shot incubated in normal saline.

Lee and Broudy speculated that the filament structures they observed could be linked to the white clots being found by embalmers in the bodies of the vaccinated, noting, “In analysis of blood clots from vaccinated persons, a few filament-like structures were found attached to brownish homogeneous cloudy white clots extracted from the middle layer of whole blood sediment.”

Remarkably, Dr. Carrie Madej also found in 2021 what she described as “self-assembling” and “synthetic”-looking objects in different COVID injections, including “fibers,” some of which “had a little cube structure on them,” and the emergence of brilliant colors in the Moderna jab after a couple of hours.

Interestingly, while the COVID shot manufacturers have not publicly discussed the presence of self-assembling technology in the mRNA shots, “Self-assembled mRNA vaccines” have been discussed in studies published in 2021, which note that self-assembled structures can be used to deliver COVID proteins, and that protein nanoparticles themselves can be self-assembled. A study was also published last year to the science journal Nature discussing the potential that “immunogenic self-assembling” COVID spike nanoparticles have as a “genetic vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2.

According to Lee and Broudy, the “various kinds of transparent ribbons, films, coils, and spirals” that appeared in the Pfizer shot when incubated in distilled water “were very similar in structure to the micro- and magnetic- nanorobots already presented in numerous scholarly papers.”

Toxic effects on blood 

In addition to showing the self-assembly of what appear to be synthetic nanoparticles, Lee and Broudy’s experiments have demonstrated the effect the COVID shots have on blood: Each injectable showed “toxic effects on blood cells,” with Novavax showing particularly rapid cytotoxicity. The researchers found that each shot had a distinct effect on blood cells, with Pfizer triggering “cellular collapse of white blood cells and damaged platelets”; Moderna triggering rouleaux (stacking) of red blood cells; Novavax causing the disintegration of the nucleus of white blood cells and some rouleaux of red blood cells, and AstraZeneca triggering “prominent rouleaux.”

The researchers noted that white blood cell damage can be related to immune suppression, fatigue can be linked to Rouleaux blood formation, and blood clot formations can be related to platelet damage. Their findings are especially significant considering that all of these symptoms have been frequently reported after COVID injections.

For example, a study published earlier this year shows that the COVID shots pose a risk of blood clots to the brain that is 200 times greater than that posed by other vaccines over the past three decades. In addition, increasing evidence is emerging linking the COVID shots to a spike in cancer rates, with studies and doctors finding that the jabs cause immunosuppression. Long-term fatigue is also a commonly reported symptom of the shots. One German doctor, Jörg-Heiner Möller, has described a “PostVac” syndrome he says 120 of his patients have suffered after their COVID shots, which often involves a “severe fatigue syndrome.”

EMFs

Another remarkable observation by Lee and Broudy was that of the effect of electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) on the self-assembly of the COVID shot contents. For example, when the Moderna vial contents were placed on a cell phone in 5G streaming mode over a wireless recharger, “the floating materials abruptly became larger and more numerous with sharper and more rectangular edges.”

According to the researchers, Pfizer’s shot did not demonstrate an immediate effect under the same conditions, but a “delayed effect” of proliferating “filaments” after a month of exposure.

By contrast, while Moderna’s shot showed “no noticeable effects” after exposure to an external hard drive, which emits magnetic fields, the Pfizer shot showed “modest” degradation of its contents. The researchers concluded, “it could be postulated that some kind of electric current can stimulate the nanostructure’s activity, while some conditioned magnetic current can hamper their activity.”

It is noteworthy that Lee and Broudy are not the first to observe that EMFs have an impact on the contents of the COVID shots. Dr. David Nixon found that the formation of “crystalline structures” in the Pfizer COVID shots appeared to depend on their exposure to electromagnetic frequencies. When he put the slide of Pfizer shot fluid “inside a faraday bag” blocking EMFs he said came from his wireless router, he only saw black, round “dots” form within its contents, as opposed to the boxy shapes with sharp right angles that otherwise formed.

In addition, Ecuador-based electrical engineer Matt Taylor has observed striking effects of EMFs on the self-assembly of unidentified objects within the COVID shots. He testified in 2022 that when he put a drop of the COVID jab on a microscope slide and placed that slide on an internet router, he observed the self-assembly of what he believes “look like integrated circuits.”

According to Taylor, when he turned the router off, the objects “immediately” began to break apart. He repeated the experiment three times and “begg[ed]” people to reproduce his investigation to see if his findings can be replicated. In fact, Nixon had indicated that Taylor had inspired his own test with the faraday bag.

“If someone can repeat this, the implications are so incredibly wonderful. We can start to explain clots, we can start to explain detox processes,” said Taylor.

Detox

While EMF-triggered self-assembly of “vaccine” nanomaterials suggests one potential “detox” avenue, Lee and Broudy found what seem to be other ways the mRNA shots’ synthetic-looking contents can be disintegrated, if not excreted from the body.

Lee and Broudy wrote that in the “later stage” following injection, at least three weeks afterward, “colloidal gold or silver (3-5 nm in diameter and 10-20 ppm) has been observed to attach to, disrupt, actively degrade, and ultimately dissolve various nanostructures.” They added that ongoing experiments are examining the longer-term results of such protocols, and postulated that gold or silver could help in the recovery of damaged organs and normal blood flow.

The researchers also speculated that “routine exposure to heat saunas” may cause the shots’ nanomaterials to “dislodge from tissues and escape through sweat gland pores.” Reduction or even elimination of the use of personal electronics was also recommended, although Lee and Broudy did not mention the potential helpful effects of wearing EMF shielding devices after vaccination.

They concluded by calling for a worldwide moratorium on the COVID shots: “until the components can be verified and their long-term effects understood, a necessity flouted by calls for Emergency Use Authorization, an immediate global ban is needed.”

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

COVID-19

US medical center refusing COVID shots for employees but still promoting to public

Published on

Exert from Medical Musings by Dr. Pierre Kory

Major Covid mRNA policy reversals and awakenings occurred this week within a major U.S health system, a large U.S state, a South American country, and in the UK. The dominoes are starting to fall.

This week a nurse reached out with disturbing descriptions of some major changes she has witnessed inside the Ohio State University Medical Center (OSUMC) system.

OSUMC s a large and comprehensive healthcare organization, with a significant presence in Ohio and a strong focus on research, education, and patient care. It is a massive institution with over 23,000 employees, including:

  • Over 2,000 physicians
  • More than 1,000 residents and fellows
  • Nearly 5,000 nurses

Lets start off with this screenshot of a webpage from OSUMC’s website which provides information to the public as to where they can get Covid-19 vaccines. Check out the highlighted sentence at the bottom of the page:

Wait, what? Ohio State is suddenly no longer offering the Covid-19 vaccine to any of their employees but they are happily offering to inject them into the public? How can such a policy be justified? Why was this change in policy done and why was it done so quietly?

Let’s get this straight. Ohio State’s leadership is now making an institutional decision that employees should not be offerred access to any Covid-19 mRNA vaccine. I am (pretending to be) confused. I mean, if the vaccines could protect patients from being infected by staff members and they were safe to give to staff members, why wouldn’t you do everything possible (like a mandate) to ensure they receive them?

The only possible reason for the action above is that either OSUMC leadership recently discovered that the vaccines: a) do not work or b) are not safe. I think you would agree that, of the two possible answers, the only one that makes sense to explain this abrupt change in policy is B) they are not safe. I say this because if they were safe but instead just didn’t really work very well, Ohio State would not have the incentive to divorce themselves so abruptly and strongly from the recommendations of our benevolent federal government. I believe such an action would pretty quickly and negatively impact federal research funding by the NIH. It is my belief that agency’s money kept the nations 126 major academic medical centers in line throughout Covid, as those CEO’s and Deans are well aware that NIH retaliation in terms of rejecting grant funding if they “dissent” is real and happens (inflated reimbursements from the gov’t was another one of course).

I asked the brave browser AI, “why is Ohio State Medical Center no longer offering Covid-19 vaccines to its employees?” Two sentences jumped out:

  • “Based on the provided search results, it appears that Ohio State Medical Center did offer COVID-19 vaccines to its employees at one point.”
  • “Without further information or clarification from Ohio State Medical Center, it’s difficult to provide a definitive answer on why they may not be offering COVID-19 vaccines to their employees.”

So it must be the case that Ohio State leadership somehow found themselves a stronger financial disincentive to subjecting employees to Covid-19 vaccine injection. Where would such a disincentive come from? Answer: lawsuits. I also suspect that fear of worsening staff shortages from disability and/or death further disrupting operations played a role as well (as you will learn below).

This new policy action (taken very quietly) is absolutely dam breaking to me in terms of progress towards the truth about the mRNA platform getting out to the public. It is also appears ethically reprehensible, i.e. the institution made the decision to keep jabbing the public with a toxic and lethal vaccine while becoming aware that same vaccine is either exposing them to unmanageable legal risks and/or is disrupting their operations by negatively impacting the health of their workforce. Welcome to dystopia.

To see the rest of this article click here.

Continue Reading

COVID-19

Trial for Freedom Convoy leaders ends, verdict may take 6 months

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

In her concluding statements last Friday in an Ottawa courthouse, presiding judge Heather Perkins-McVey said that she does ‘not know’ when a decision will be rendered in the Freedom Convoy leaders’ trial.

The trial for Freedom Convoy leaders Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, which was supposed to have been only 16 days long, has now concluded after over a year, with the presiding judge observing that determining a verdict, which could take up to six months, will be “daunting” task.  

In her concluding statements last Friday in an Ottawa courthouse, presiding judge Heather Perkins-McVey said that she does “not know” when she will “be in a position to give my decision,” adding that coming up with a verdict will be “a little daunting.” 

The judge has promised that on November 26, she will be providing an update as to when a decision could be forthcoming.  

The trial has been ongoing for over one year and began on September 3, 2023. As reported by LifeSiteNews, both Lich and Barber face a possible 10-year prison sentence for their role in the 2022 Freedom Convoy.

In an X post on Friday, Lich shared her thoughts on the trial finally wrapping up.  

“Well, that’s a wrap to the Longest Mischief Trial of All Time,” she wrote. 

“The Crown really disappointed me today. His remarks about the Event That Shall Not Be Named (Freedom Convoy) being nothing more than a weekend party are indicative of a level of smugness and elitism that I can never and will never understand,” added Lich.

Both Lich and Barber had attended the hearings in person, travelling from their homes in Alberta and Saskatchewan respectively. Last Friday, however, they attended via video.

The Crown prosecution has held steadfast to the notion that Lich and Barber somehow influenced the protesters’ actions through their words as part of a co-conspiracy. This claim has been rejected by the defense as weak. 

It has also been asserted “that the absence of violence or peaceful nature of the protest didn’t make it lawful, emphasizing that the onus was on the Crown to prove the protest’s unlawfulness.” 

The reality is that Lich and Barber collaborated with police on many occasions so that the protest remained law abiding.  

The Democracy Fund, which is crowdfunding Lich’s legal costs, noted in one of its last legal updates of the trial that it expected the Crown would try to prove the leaders were “co-conspirators,” meaning that accusations placed against one leader automatically apply to the other.

As reported by LifeSiteNews at the time, despite the non-violent nature of the protest and the charges, Lich was jailed for  weeks before she was granted bail. 

Continue Reading

Trending

X