Connect with us

COVID-19

Bill Gates to stand trial in Netherlands COVID vaccine injury lawsuit

Published

8 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Michael Nevradakis Ph. D., The Defender

A Netherlands court last week ruled that Bill Gates can stand trial in the Netherlands, in a case involving seven people injured by COVID-19 vaccines. Other defendants include Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, and the Dutch state.

A Netherlands court last week ruled thatĀ Bill Gates can stand trialĀ in the Netherlands, in a case involving seven people injured by COVID-19Ā vaccines.

According to Dutch newspaperĀ De Telegraaf, the seven ā€œcorona skepticsā€Ā sued GatesĀ last year, along with former Dutch prime minister and newly appointedĀ NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, and ā€œseveral membersā€ of the Dutch government’s COVID-19 ā€œOutbreak Management Team.ā€

Other defendants includeĀ Albert Bourla, Ph.D., CEO of Pfizer, and the Dutch state.

ā€œBecause Bill Gates’ foundation was involved in combating the corona pandemic, he has also been summoned,ā€Ā De TelegraafĀ reported.

According to Dutch independent news outletĀ Zebra Inspiratie, the plaintiffs allege that Gates, through his representatives, deliberately misled them about the safety of theĀ COVID-19Ā shots, despite knowing ā€œthat these injections wereĀ not safe and effective.ā€

Dutch independent journalist Erica Krikke told The Defender that the seven plaintiffs – whose names are redacted in the lawsuit’s publicly available documents – ā€œare ordinary Dutch people, and they have been jabbed and after the jabs they got sick.ā€

Krikke said that of the seven original plaintiffs, one has since died, leaving the other six plaintiffs to continue the lawsuit.

The lawsuit was filed in theĀ District Court of Leeuwarden. According toĀ De Telegraaf, ā€œGates had objected because, according to him, the judges did not have jurisdiction.ā€ Accordingly, the court first ā€œhad to rule in the so-called incident procedure,ā€Ā De Andere KrantĀ reported.

According toĀ De Andere Krant, Gates was represented by theĀ Pels RijckenĀ law firm, based in The Hague, described as ā€œtheĀ largest and the premier litigation law firmĀ in the Netherlands.ā€ Gates did not appear at the Sept. 18 hearing, but attorneys for Gates argued that the court ā€œhad no jurisdiction over him because he lives in the United States.ā€

However, in itsĀ Oct. 16 ruling, the Leeuwarden court ruled it does have jurisdiction over Gates.Ā De Andere KrantĀ reported that the court found ā€œsufficient evidenceā€ that the claims against Gates and the other defendants are ā€œconnectedā€ and based on the same ā€œcomplex of facts.ā€

Other defendants who reside outside of the Netherlands, including Bourla, did not challenge the court’s jurisdiction.

The court ruled Gates must pay attorneys’ fees and additional legal costs totaling 1,406 euros (approximately $1,520). A hearing is scheduled for Nov. 27.

ā€˜Even if … your name is Bill Gates, you still have to go to court’

In remarks shared withĀ De Andere Krant, Arno van Kessel, one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys, welcomed the ruling. ā€œIn its verdict, the court has clearly recorded the basis of our conclusions of claim,ā€ van Kessel said.

Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst told The Defender it is ā€œquite interestingā€ that the plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in Leeuwarden instead of The Hague, where normally, all cases against the government related to COVID-19 are filed.

ā€œIn general, COVID-19 court cases have been very unsuccessful in the Netherlands,ā€ Terhorst said. ā€œThere is a slim chance it will be successful.ā€

She added:

I think most judges support the COVID-19 vaccination agenda and will find it hard to believe the vaccinations have caused injuries. So, we have a long way to go, regardless of the case.

Krikke shared a more optimistic outlook, saying that the court sent a message that ā€œeven if you are rich and your name is Bill Gates, you still have to go to court.ā€

New Zealand-based independent journalistĀ Penny Marie, who has closely followed the proceedings in this case, told The Defender she hopes the Oct. 16 ruling ā€œwill hopefully set a precedent and help plaintiffs in similar cases around the world regarding jurisdiction,ā€ in cases ā€œwhere the defendant does not reside in the country of the plaintiff.ā€

ā€œFor parties who make claims against those involved in the implementation of theĀ Great ResetĀ and other international actions, such as the COVID-19 emergency response initiated by the WEF [World Economic Forum] and imposed on all U.N. member nations, I hope that this ruling provides an opportunity for others to follow suit,ā€ Marie added.

Father of vaccine-injured plaintiff made ā€˜emotional plea’ to the court

At the Sept. 18 hearing, plaintiffs also delivered statements. According toĀ Zebra Inspiratie, ā€œOne of the victims, who is very ill, was also given the opportunity to make a plea. She was no longer able to speak and was represented by her father. It was anĀ emotional plea.ā€

Krikke said the plaintiff’s father told the court that his daughter, who was previously healthy, fell ill after getting the COVID-19 vaccine and could no longer speak, telling the judge that he ā€œwould really like to speak to Bill Gates directlyā€ to ask him what happened to his daughter.

ā€œAfter that, the judge was really quiet,ā€ Krikke said.

The Oct. 18 ruling also addressed the plaintiffs’ claims aboutĀ Gates’ roleĀ in the WEF’s ā€œGreat Resetā€ project.

ā€œThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is also affiliated with the World Economic Forum … an international organization whose statutory objective is to unite ā€˜leaders from business, governments, academia and society at large into a global community committed to improving the state of the world,ā€™ā€Ā the rulingĀ states, adding:

This is a project aimed at the total reorganization of societies in all countries that are members of the United Nations … as described by [WEF founder and executive chairmanĀ Klaus Schwab] in his bookĀ Covid-19: The Great Reset. …

Characteristic of this political ideology is that this forced and planned change is presented as justified by pretending that the world is suffering from major crises that can only be solved by centralized, hardĀ global intervention. One of these pretended major crises concerns the Covid-19 pandemic.

The ruling also states, ā€œTheĀ Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationĀ isĀ affiliated with ā€˜Gavi, the Vaccine Allianceā€˜ … an international partnership in the field of vaccinations between various public and private entities.ā€

This article was originally published byĀ The Defender – Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please considerĀ subscribing to The DefenderĀ orĀ donating to Children’s Health Defense.

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

COVID-19

Nearly Half of ā€œCOVID-19 Deathsā€ Were Not Due to COVID-19 – Scientific Reports Journal

Published on

FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse) Nicolas Hulscher, MPH's avatarĀ Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

45.3% of ā€œCOVID-19 deathsā€ in Greece had no symptoms — exposing the coordinated PSYOP deployed to maximize fear and enforce mass compliance with draconian control measures.

The study titled ā€œDeaths ā€œdue toā€ COVID-19 and deaths ā€œwithā€ COVID-19 during the Omicron variant surge, among hospitalized patients in seven tertiary-care hospitals, Athens, Greeceā€ was just published in the journalĀ Scientific Reports:

Abstract

In Greek hospitals, all deaths with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test are counted as COVID-19 deaths. Our aim was to investigate whether COVID-19 was the primary cause of death, a contributing cause of death or not-related to death amongst patients who died in hospitals during the Omicron surge and were registered as COVID-19 deaths. Additionally, we aimed to analyze the factors associated with the classification of these deaths. We retrospectively re-viewed all in-hospital deaths, that were reported as COVID-19 deaths, in 7 hospitals, serving Athens, Greece, from January 1, 2022, until August 31, 2022. We retrieved clinical and laboratory data from patient records. Each death reported as COVID-19 death was characterized as: (A) death ā€œdue toā€ COVID-19, or (B) death ā€œwithā€ COVID-19. We reviewed 530 in-hospital deaths, classified as COVID-19 deaths (52.4% males; mean age 81.7 ± 11.1 years). We categorized 290 (54.7%) deaths as attributable or related to COVID-19 and in 240 (45.3%) deaths unrelated to COVID-19. In multivariable analysis The two groups differed significantly in age (83.6 ± 9.8 vs. 79.9 ± 11.8,Ā p = 0.016), immunosuppression history (11% vs. 18.8%,Ā p = 0.027), history of liver disease (1.4% vs. 8.4%,Ā p = 0.047) and the presence of COVID-19 symptoms (p < 0.001). Hospital stay was greater in persons dying from non-COVID-19 related causes. Among 530 in-hospital deaths, registered as COVID-19 deaths, in seven hospitals in Athens during the Omicron wave, 240 (45.28%) were reassessed as not directly attributable to COVID-19. Accuracy in defining the cause of death during the COVID-19 pandemic is of paramount importance for surveillance and intervention purposes.


Key Findings:

Massive Overcounting of COVID-19 Deaths

  • Out of 530 hospital deaths registered as COVID-19 deaths,Ā only 290 (54.7%) were actually caused by COVID-19.
  • 240 deaths (45.3%) were found to be completely unrelated to COVID-19 — patients diedĀ withĀ a positive PCR test, but showed no symptoms, required no COVID-specific treatment, and died of clearly unrelated causes.

Death Certificate Inaccuracy

  • Of the 204 certificates listing COVID-19 as the direct cause of death,Ā only 132 (64.7%)Ā were confirmed as such after clinical review.
  • Of the 324 certificates listing COVID-19 as a contributing factor,Ā only 86 (26.5%)Ā were found to be truly related.

Hospital-Acquired Infections Misclassified

  • Patients infectedĀ during hospitalizationĀ were significantly more likely to be misclassified as COVID-19 deaths (OR:Ā 2.3,Ā pĀ = 0.001).

Younger Age and Severe Comorbidities Associated with Misclassification

  • Patients who died ā€œwithā€ COVID-19 were younger, more likely to be immunosuppressed, have end-stage liver disease, or be admitted for other causes.

Symptoms and Treatments Differed Sharply

Patients who diedĀ ā€œdue toā€Ā COVID-19 were more likely to:

  • Exhibit classic symptoms:Ā hypoxia (44.1%),Ā shortness of breath,Ā fever, andĀ cough
  • RequireĀ oxygen supportĀ (93.4% vs. 66.9%) and receive COVID-specific therapies:
    • RemdesivirĀ (5-day course: 61.9% vs. 35.2%)
    • DexamethasoneĀ (81.7% vs. 40.7%)

Study Strengths

This study went far beyond death certificate coding, implementing a rigorous, multi-source clinical audit:

  • Full medical chart reviews: Included physician notes, lab data, imaging, and treatment records.
  • Attending physician interviews: Structured questionnaires captured real-time clinical insights from those who treated the patients.
  • Dual independent expert assessments: Two experienced infectious disease specialists (each with >2,500 COVID cases) reviewed each case independently for classification accuracy.

This study found that nearly half of all registered COVID-19 deaths during the Omicron wave in Greece were misclassified, with no clinical evidence linking them to COVID-19 as the true cause. Given that similar death coding practices were employed across Western nations, it is reasonable to conclude that COVID-19 death counts were artificially inflated to a comparable degree elsewhere.

This drastic inflation of death counts aligns with what many now understand to be a coordinated psychological operation (PSYOP)—designed to instill fear and maximize compliance with draconian pandemic measures such as lockdowns, mask mandates, and mass mRNA injection campaigns.

It is this weaponization of fear that has promptedĀ criminal referrals in seven U.S. states, triggering active criminal investigations into top COVID-19 officials for terrorism, murder and racketeering:

BREAKING – The Pandemic Justice Phase Begins as Criminal Investigations Commence

Ā·
Apr 18
BREAKING - The Pandemic Justice Phase Begins as Criminal Investigations Commence
 

By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

 

Read full story

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

www.mcculloughfnd.org

Please consider following both theĀ McCullough FoundationĀ andĀ my personal accountĀ onĀ XĀ (formerly Twitter) for further content.

Continue Reading

2025 Federal Election

Before the Vote: Ask Who’s Defending Our Health

Published on

The health of Canadians has been compromised by government-mandated COVID-19 injections.Ā The upcoming federal election is an opportunity to demand change and accountability. As you decide which candidate or party is most committed to defending the health of yourself and your family, please consider the following:

The Injections Were Never What They Claimed

The Canadian government successfullyĀ mandatedĀ the COVID-19 injections by labeling them ā€œsafe and effective vaccines.ā€ These products are still beingĀ promotedĀ andĀ administeredĀ across the country. However, the truth is:

  • They are not vaccines:Ā Click Here
  • They are not safe:Ā Click Here
  • They do not prevent infection or transmission.
  • Evidence shows they increase the risk of COVID-19 disease and death:Ā Click Here

These Products Contain Multiple Mechanisms of Harm

  • They cause injury through multiple biological mechanisms:Ā Click Here
  • They have surpassed all vaccines in recorded history—for all infections, for all of the past thirty years combined—in causing deaths and injuries:Ā Click Here
  • They are chemically contaminated and adulterated with DNA:Ā Click Here
  • In Pfizer’s case, fraud is evident: the DNA contamination includes genetic engineering tools derived from the SV40 virus, associated with cancer risks:Ā Click Here

This Election, We Must Demand Accountability

Insist that to have your vote, candidates must:

  • Denounce the COVID-19 ā€œvaccines.ā€
  • Support a full halt to their manufacturing and administration.
  • Uphold informed consent, scientific integrity, and bodily autonomy.

Your voice is important.Ā Use it to reject censorship, harm, and medical coercion.

Continue Reading

Trending

X