An era of Indigenous economic leadership in Canada has begun

Energy for a Secure Future (ESF), the Institute of Energy Economics, Japan (IEEJ), and the First Nations LNG Alliance have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to increase energy trade between Canada and Japan. The MOU was signed at the Canadian Embassy in Tokyo and recognizes the growing importance of Indigenous-led LNG projects in Canada’s energy security, reducing global emissions, and driving economic growth for First Nations and the country as a whole.

With Canada’s trade relationship with the U.S. uncertain—especially with U.S. President Donald Trump threatening a 25 per cent tariff on Canadian exports, including 10 per cent on energy—the need to diversify markets has never been more pressing. Canada ships 97 per cent of its oil and gas to the U.S., leaving the country exposed to the political whims of Washington. Expanding trade partnerships with key allies like Japan provides an opportunity to mitigate these risks and build a more resilient economy.

At the heart of Canada’s modern energy industry are First Nations-led LNG projects, which are proving to be a model for economic reconciliation and environmental responsibility. The Haisla Nation’s Cedar LNG, the Squamish Nation’s involvement with Woodfibre LNG, and the Nisga’a Nation’s Ksi Lisims LNG project exemplify Indigenous leadership in Canada’s energy future. These projects bring economic prosperity to Indigenous communities and position Canada as a key player in low-emission energy for the world.

Few people embody this leadership more than Chief Crystal Smith of the Haisla Nation, who received the 2025 Testimonial Dinner Award on February 7. Her vision and determination have brought Cedar LNG—the world’s first Indigenous-majority-owned LNG facility—to life. Under her leadership, this $4-billion project will start up in 2028 and will be one of the most sustainable LNG facilities in the world, powered entirely by BC Hydro’s renewable electricity. Her work is not just about resource development—it represents a country-changing shift in Indigenous economic leadership. By owning the majority of the Cedar LNG project, the Haisla Nation has set a precedent for economic self-determination, long-term job creation, revenue generation, and skills training for Indigenous youth.

She is echoed by Karen Ogen, CEO of the First Nations LNG Alliance, who has been a long-time advocate for Indigenous participation in LNG. As she says, “Our involvement in LNG not only represents an opportunity for economic growth for our communities and for Canada but will help the world with energy security and emissions reduction.”

The MOU signed in Tokyo signals Japan’s growing interest in Canadian LNG as part of its energy security strategy. Japan is phasing out coal and needs reliable, low-emission energy sources—Canadian LNG is the answer. Shannon Joseph, Chair of Energy for a Secure Future, said, “Japan wants diverse energy partners, and on this mission, we’ve heard clearly that they want Canada to be one of those partners.”

This partnership also highlights Canada’s missed opportunities over the last decade. As industry leaders like Eric Nuttall of Ninepoint Partners have pointed out, Canada could have avoided its current dependence on U.S. markets had it built more pipelines to the east and west coasts. The cancellation of the Northern Gateway and Energy East pipelines left Canada without the infrastructure to reach Asian and European markets.

Now, with the expansion of Trans Mountain (TMX) and the rise of Indigenous-led LNG projects, Canada has a second chance to shape its energy future.

As B.C. Minister of Economic Development Diana Gibson has said, expanding trade relationships beyond the U.S. is key to Canada’s future.

The First Nations-led LNG sector is demonstrating that Indigenous leadership is driving economic reconciliation and strengthening Canada’s geopolitical influence in global energy markets. For too long, Indigenous communities were merely stakeholders in resource projects—now they are owners and partners. First Nations are proving that responsible development and environmental stewardship can coexist.

With the MOU between Canada and Japan, the growth of LNG projects, and the recognition of Chief Crystal Smith, a new era of Indigenous economic power is emerging. These developments make one thing clear: First Nations are not just leading their communities—they are leading Canada.

In times of trade uncertainty, their vision, resilience, and business acumen are building the foundation for Canada’s energy future, ensuring prosperity is shared between Indigenous peoples and all Canadians.

Up Next

Senate Judiciary Committee approves Kash Patel’s FBI nomination in party-line vote

Don't Miss

Carbon tariff proposal carries risks and consequences for Canada

Todayville

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Jury: Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions in damages over pipeline project protests

National / 1 hour ago

Daughter of Canadian PM Mark Carney uses ‘they/them’ pronouns

Courageous Discourse / 2 hours ago

Europe Turns Totalitarian

Business

Trudeau collecting two pensions worth $8.4 million

Published on March 19, 2025

Todayville

By Franco Terrazzano

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is calling on all party leaders to commit to ending the second pension for prime ministers.

“Taxpayers can’t afford to pay for all of the perks in Ottawa and the government should start saving money by ending the prime minister’s second taxpayer-funded pension,” said Franco Terrazzano, CTF Federal Director. “Prime ministers already take a salary nearly six times more than the average Canadian and they already get a lucrative MP pension, so taxpayers shouldn’t be on the hook for a second pension for prime ministers.”

Trudeau will collect two taxpayer-funded pensions in retirement. Combined, those pensions total $8.4 million, according to CTF estimates.

First, there’s the MP pension.

The payouts for Trudeau’s MP pension will begin at $141,000 per year when he turns 55 years old. It will total an estimated $6.5 million should he live to the age of 90.

Then there’s the prime minister’s pension.

“A prime minister who holds the Office of the Prime Minister for at least four years is entitled to receive a special retirement allowance in addition to their members of Parliament pension benefit,” according to the government of Canada.

The payouts for Trudeau’s prime minister pension will begin at $73,000 per year when he turns 67 years old. It will total an estimated $1.9 million should he live to the age of 90.

Add the $6.5-million MP pension to the $1.9-million prime minister’s pension and Trudeau will collect a total of about $8.4 million.

The prime minister’s current annual salary is $406,200.

Trudeau’s pension payouts would be even higher if not for reforms implemented in 2012, which increased the retirement age, cut benefits and saw MPs increase their own contributions. Prior to the reforms, MPs contributed just $1 for every $24 of taxpayer and federal monies invested in their pensions.

Former prime minister Stephen Harper forfeited an estimated $1 million to $2 million in additional payouts by implementing the reforms. Nevertheless, the CTF estimates Harper’s lifetime pensions will total about $7 million.

“A prime minister already takes millions through their first pension, they shouldn’t be billing taxpayers more for their second pension,” Terrazzano said. “Taxpayers need to see leadership at the top and all party leaders should commit to ending the second pension for future prime ministers.”

Business

Next federal government should reduce size of Ottawa’s bureaucracy

Published on March 19, 2025

Todayville

From the Fraser Institute

By Jake Fuss

With an election looming, and despite uncertainty over when the next federal budget will be tabled, the federal government recently launched its pre-budget consultations to get input from Canadians about their policy priorities.

And a change in course is long overdue. For example, from 2018 to 2023, the Trudeau government recorded the six highest levels of per-person spending (adjusted for inflation) in Canadian history. Put differently, before, during and after COVID the government spent more money annually than it did during the Great Depression, both world wars, and the peak of the Global Financial Crisis in 2008/09.

Meanwhile, the revenue generated through a bevy of tax hikes (on top income earners and 86 per cent of middle-income families) has been insufficient to pay for all this spending. So the government chose to borrow and burden future generations of Canadians who will pay for today’s debt through higher taxes tomorrow. Consequently, the Trudeau government ran nine consecutive deficits and total federal debt per person (adjusted for inflation) is now at the highest point in Canadian history.

And according to projections, the state of federal finances will likely get worse. At its current trajectory of spending, the government will run six more deficits between 2024/25 and 2029/30 and accumulate substantially more debt. Of course, like households, government must pay interest on debt, and rising interest costs leave less money available for programs and services. By 2029/30, the government will spend a projected $69.4 billion on debt interest payments, which is significantly more than projected GST revenue that year.

To prevent this scenario, the next federal government—whoever that may be—should review in detail all areas of federal spending, find potential savings based on the Chrétien government’s successful approach in the 1990s, balance the budget and end the red ink.

A good first step would be to reduce the size of the federal bureaucracy. Federal government employment (as measured in full-time equivalents) in Ottawa and across the country increased by 26.1 per cent between 2015/16 and 2022/23—growing nearly three times as fast as the Canadian population. Had the size of the federal bureaucracy simply grown in line with population growth, federal spending would be $7.5 billion lower than it is today.

Despite this sizeable increase in government, many Canadians remain frustrated with service quality. According to a 2023 poll, nearly half (44 per cent) of Canadians feel they receive “poor” or “very poor” value from government services. More administrators and managers in government has also failed to help produce higher living standards for Canadians. As of September 2024, per-person GDP, an indicator of incomes and living standards, was down 2.2 per cent compared to five years earlier (after adjusting for inflation). Reducing the number of federal bureaucrats would provide billions in savings for Ottawa to reduce the deficit and help pave a path back to budget balance, without sacrificing service quality.

The government could find additional savings by eliminating corporate welfare and subsidies to legacy media outlets, and abolishing the Canada Infrastructure Bank, which since 2017 has approved “investments” totalling $13.2 billion (as of the fourth quarter of 2023-24) and completed only two projects—the purchase of 20 electric buses in Edmonton and the construction of two solar facilities in Calgary.

Ottawa’s addiction to spending and debt cannot continue. Returning to balanced budgets must be a top priority in the next federal budget and for the next government.