News

Take A Photo Tour Of Red Deer’s Newest Fire Station!

Published

8 years ago

4 minute read

Written by Sheldon Spackman

Photos by Lindsay Wiebe

Numerous dignitaries were on hand for the official ribbon-cutting ceremony to open Red Deer’s newest fire hall on Monday. Mayor Tara Veer, City Manager Craig Curtis and members of City Council among others were on hand to get an inside tour of Fire Station # 4 in the Timberlands neighbourhood.

The facility which cost over $7 Million dollars and largely funded by the province, was completed on time and under budget. City officials say significant cost-savings were achieved by using a design made to suit two new stations, #3 and #4, with only slight variations between the two. The difference being a training tower at the Timberlands station that isn’t at the new Fire Station # 3 by the Collicut Centre.

Officials say Fire Station # 4’s multi-use areas incorporate training areas in the stairwell, apparatus bay and in multiple places on the roof. These training areas will allow firefighters to practice high angle rescues, repel drills, standpipe operations and firefighter survival evolutions. Fire Chief Brian Makey says the facility was largely designed with input from their staff, utilizing the best concepts and ideas that came from those consultations. He says “There’s training components for high-angle rescue and confined spaces that are built right into the structure.” Makey adds that it’s a pre-fab building made of pre-cast concrete, which allowed for the building to go up quickly and get done sooner. He points out this resulted in the project coming in under budget, saving the City money for future Capital projects. Makey says the location of the building will also ensure they can meet provincial regulations for response times of ten minutes or less. He says “This hall allows for the development in this area to go and as you can see just around the building, all the schools, the commercial buildings, the residential, that was because this hall’s here.”

Mayor Tara Veer says “This facility is absolutely essential for the safety of Red Deerians, not only for existing population in the northeast of the community but for future population as well. It is imperative that we meet our service level standards, so that when people in the northeast call 911, there is a fire truck or an ambulance available to respond to that call.” Veer adds, “Red Deer Emergency Servicse continues to be a model that other communities across the country aspire to, because we integrate our fire and ambulance service. Not only is it efficient from an operations perspective and a financial perspective but ultimately, it fulfills the objective of providing advanced life support and timely response to Red Deerians when they have to make that 911 call.”

Fire Station # 4 in the Timberlands has been in operation since January 17th, 2017 and currently requires an average of six staff at a time. However, it can accommodate up to 10 in preparation for long-term growth. An Open House is anticipated later this year.

Up Next

Blackfalds Mayor Requests Town’s Name Be Included In Provincial Constituency Name

Don't Miss

Red Deer Man Wanted On Province-Wide Warrants Arrested

Follow Author

Canada’s department of government efficiency: A blueprint

Business / 47 mins ago

Federal government’s latest media bailout another bad idea

Alberta / 1 hour ago

Alberta mother accuses health agency of trying to vaccinate son against her wishes

Business

Broken ‘equalization’ program bad for all provinces

Published on November 21, 2024

Todayville

From the Fraser Institute

By Alex Whalen and Tegan Hill

Back in the summer at a meeting in Halifax, several provincial premiers discussed a lawsuit meant to force the federal government to make changes to Canada’s equalization program. The suit—filed by Newfoundland and Labrador and backed by British Columbia, Saskatchewan and Alberta—effectively argues that the current formula isn’t fair. But while the question of “fairness” can be subjective, its clear the equalization program is broken.

In theory, the program equalizes the ability of provinces to deliver reasonably comparable services at a reasonably comparable level of taxation. Any province’s ability to pay is based on its “fiscal capacity”—that is, its ability to raise revenue.

This year, equalization payments will total a projected $25.3 billion with all provinces except B.C., Alberta and Saskatchewan to receive some money. Whether due to higher incomes, higher employment or other factors, these three provinces have a greater ability to collect government revenue so they will not receive equalization.

However, contrary to the intent of the program, as recently as 2021, equalization program costs increased despite a decline in the fiscal capacity of oil-producing provinces such as Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Newfoundland and Labrador. In other words, the fiscal capacity gap among provinces was shrinking, yet recipient provinces still received a larger equalization payment.

Why? Because a “fixed-growth rule,” introduced by the Harper government in 2009, ensures that payments grow roughly in line with the economy—even if the gap between richer and poorer provinces shrinks. The result? Total equalization payments (before adjusting for inflation) increased by 19 per cent between 2015/16 and 2020/21 despite the gap in fiscal capacities between provinces shrinking during this time.

Moreover, the structure of the equalization program is also causing problems, even for recipient provinces, because it generates strong disincentives to natural resource development and the resulting economic growth because the program “claws back” equalization dollars when provinces raise revenue from natural resource development. Despite some changes to reduce this problem, one study estimated that a recipient province wishing to increase its natural resource revenues by a modest 10 per cent could face up to a 97 per cent claw back in equalization payments.

Put simply, provinces that generally do not receive equalization such as Alberta, B.C. and Saskatchewan have been punished for developing their resources, whereas recipient provinces such as Quebec and in the Maritimes have been rewarded for not developing theirs.

Finally, the current program design also encourages recipient provinces to maintain high personal and business income tax rates. While higher tax rates can reduce the incentive to work, invest and be productive, they also raise the national standard average tax rate, which is used in the equalization allocation formula. Therefore, provinces are incentivized to maintain high and economically damaging tax rates to maximize equalization payments.

Unless premiers push for reforms that will improve economic incentives and contain program costs, all provinces—recipient and non-recipient—will suffer the consequences.

Authors:

Alex Whalen and Tegan Hill

National

Liberals, NDP admit closed-door meetings took place in attempt to delay Canada’s next election

Published on November 12, 2024

Todayville

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

Pushing back the date would preserve the pensions of some of the MPs who could be voted out of office in October 2025.

Aides to the cabinet of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau confirmed that MPs from the Liberal and New Democratic Party (NDP) did indeed hold closed-door “briefings” to rewrite Canada’s elections laws so that they could push back the date of the next election.

The closed-door talks between the NDP and Liberals confirmed the aides included a revision that would guarantee some of its 28 MPs, including three of Trudeau’s cabinet members, would get a pension.

Allen Sutherland, who serves as the assistant cabinet secretary, testified before the House of Commons affairs committee that the changes to the Elections Act were discussed in the meetings.

“We attended a meeting where the substance of that proposal was discussed,” he said, adding that his “understanding is the briefing was primarily oral.”

According to Sutherland, as reported by Blacklock’s Reporter, it was only NDP and Liberal MPs who attended the secret meetings regarding changes to Canada’s Elections Act via Bill C-65, An Act to Amend the Canada Elections Act before the bill was introduced in March.

As reported by LifeSiteNews before, the Liberals were hoping to delay the 2025 federal election by a few days in what many see as a stunt to secure pensions for MPs who are projected to lose their seats. Approximately 80 MPs would qualify for pensions should they sit as MPs until at least October 27, 2025, which is the newly proposed election date. The election date is currently set for October 20, 2025.

Sutherland noted when asked by Conservative MP Luc Berthold that he recalled little from the meetings, but he did confirm he attended “two meetings of that kind.”

“Didn’t you find it unusual that a discussion about amending the Elections Act included only two political parties and excluded the others?” Berthold asked.

Sutherland responded, “It’s important to understand what my role was in those meetings which was simply to provide background information.”

“My role was to provide information,” replied Sutherland, who added he could not provide the exact dates of the meetings.

MPs must serve at least six years to qualify for a pension that pays $77,900 a year. Should an election be called today, many MPs would fall short of reaching the six years, hence Bill C-65 was introduced by the Liberals and NDP.

The Liberals have claimed that pushing back the next election date is not over pensions but due to “trying to observe religious holidays,” as noted by Liberal MP Mark Gerretsen.

“Conservatives voted against this bill,” Berthold said, as they are “confident of winning re-election. We don’t need this change.”

Trudeau’s popularity is at a all-time low, but he has refused to step down as PM, call an early election, or even step aside as Liberal Party leader.

As for the amendments to elections laws, they come after months of polling in favour of the Conservative Party under the leadership of Pierre Poilievre.

A recent poll found that 70 percent of Canadians believe the country is “broken” as Trudeau focuses on less critical issues. Similarly, in January, most Canadians reported that they are worse off financially since Trudeau took office.

Additionally, a January poll showed that 46 percent of Canadians expressed a desire for the federal election to take place sooner rather than the latest mandated date in the fall of 2025.