New York Dem Tells Adams It’s Time To Turn ‘Tough Talk’ On Immigration Into Action

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

New York City Mayor Eric Adams declared that he is willing to work with the Trump administration to help crack down on illegal migrant crime, but a fellow Democrat is pushing him to prove he means what he’s saying.

Adams said Tuesday that he is prepared to sit down with soon-to-be border czar Tom Homan to discuss the incoming administration’s plans to deport criminal illegal migrants out of the Big Apple, and he dared his opponents to “cancel me” if they aren’t happy with it. However, NYC Council Member Robert Holden, a Democrat and co-chairman of the moderate Common-Sense Caucus, responded by pushing the mayor to “show his commitment” by rolling back a number of sanctuary policies that are holding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents back.

“Tough talk is good, but actions speak louder,” Holden said in a Wednesday statement. “The Mayor had the chance to amend or repeal sanctuary city laws through his Charter Revision Commission but chose not to.”

“Now, it’s time to right these wrongs,” Holden continued. “To truly show commitment to public safety, Mayor Adams should reopen the ICE office at Rikers Island and give the NYPD, DOC [Department of Corrections], and DOP [Department of Probation] the ability to communicate with ICE and honor detainers for criminal migrants.”

NYC’s status as a sanctuary city has long been a contentious issue with local leaders, especially in recent months as a spate of high-profile crimes allegedly committed by illegal migrants have become national headlines.

Former Mayor Bill de Blasio in 2014 signed into law a bill that largely prohibits the New York Police Department from cooperating with federal immigration authorities, and he enacted legislation in 2018 that doubled down on the policy. A major facet of de Blasio’s sanctuary city rollout was the eviction of ICE agents from Rikers Island, a major prison facility located in The Bronx.

Barring ICE agents from prison facilities makes their job incredibly more difficult and dangerous because they are forced to make apprehensions of criminal migrants out in the public, federal immigration authorities argue.

NYC has been hit particularly hard by the national immigration crisis. Hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers have landed in the Big Apple since 2022 and officials have burned through billions of taxpayer dollars trying to manage the situation, according to city officials. The crisis has forced Adams to grow increasingly less sympathetic to the city’s sanctuary laws.

However, when Common Sense Caucus members introduced legislation earlier this year that would’ve rolled back sanctuary city legislation, it went nowhere in the NYC Council, which is dominated by liberal lawmakers. Members of the moderate caucus group said Adams could’ve done more to bring the issue to voters when he created the Charter Revision Commission, which had the authority to hand the decision to voters by placing it on the November ballot.

“The fact is that our city’s sanctuary city status has become deeply unpopular, even among Democrat voters, and was almost certain to be defeated by voters if a vote was allowed,” GOP Councilwoman Vickie Paladino said in a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation in July after the Commission opted not to include a referendum on the sanctuary city laws this year.

“But once again, the party which lectures us about ‘democracy’ is not actually interested in practicing it,” she continued.

In response to Homan’s declaration that he would not tolerate sanctuary city leaders getting in the way of his upcoming crackdown on illegal immigration, Holden wrote a letter to Adams, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and other local leaders urging them to change course because “federal statute explicitly prohibits the harboring, shielding, or concealing of illegal aliens, particularly those engaged in criminal activities.”

Up Next

Energy Security in a Turbulent World: Canada’s Moment to Lead

Don't Miss

Reports: Islamic terrorist incidents increased under Biden

Todayville

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Canada may escape the worst as Trump declares America’s economic independence with Liberation Day tariffs

2025 Federal Election / 5 hours ago

‘I’m Cautiously Optimistic’: Doug Ford Strongly Recommends Canada ‘Not To Retaliate’ Against Trump’s Tariffs

Business / 5 hours ago

Trump says wave of reciprocal tariffs will go into effect at midnight

2025 Federal Election

‘I’m Cautiously Optimistic’: Doug Ford Strongly Recommends Canada ‘Not To Retaliate’ Against Trump’s Tariffs

Published on April 2, 2025

Todayville

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By Jason Cohen

Ontario Premier Doug Ford urged Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney to avoid retaliation against the tariffs President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday.

Trump announced in the White House Rose Garden that he would impose “a minimum baseline tariff of 10%” on all goods entering the United States, with Canada not being included on the list of countries with higher rates. When asked about what Canada’s response would be on “Bloomberg: Balance of Power,” Ford said he was “cautiously optimistic” about Canada’s omission from the higher-tier tariffs and emphasized the importance of a cooperative relationship with the U.S.

WATCH:

“Well, let’s see where these tariffs go. I’m cautiously optimistic that I never saw Canada or Mexico on that list. And it just goes to show you two great countries working together, collaborating together and building relationships,” Ford said. “So again, I’m cautiously optimistic. I think if that’s the case, it’s the right thing for both the U.S and Canada.”

Host Kailey Leinz noted that there are currently tariffs on Canada in place as well as an exemption for goods that are in compliance with the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

“Does that mean, sir, at least in your mind, that it wouldn’t be appropriate for Canada to retaliate for this at this time?” Leinz asked.

“That is correct. If that’s the case, then I would highly recommend to the prime minister not to retaliate. And let’s carry on a strong relationship,” Ford answered. “Let’s build the American-Canadian fortress around both countries and be the wealthiest, most prosperous, safest two countries in the world.”

Trump declared a national emergency to levy a slew of reciprocal tariffs on what he has deemed “Liberation Day.”

“My fellow Americans, this is Liberation Day, April 2, 2025, will forever be remembered as the day American industry was reborn, the day America’s destiny was reclaimed, and the day that we began to make America wealthy again,” Trump said.

The president also announced that he would proceed with implementing a 25% tariff on “all foreign-made automobiles” that will take effect at midnight.

Ford in March had imposed a 25% surcharge on electricity to New York, Michigan and Minnesota, but promptly rescinded the policy and apologized to Americans on WABC’s “Cats & Cosby” radio show the following day. The tariffs were a retaliatory measure against Trump’s flurry of tariffs against Canada since starting his second term.

Daily Caller

Biden Administration Was Secretly More Involved In Ukraine Than It Let On, Investigation Reveals

Published on March 31, 2025

Todayville

From the Daily Caller News Foundation

By Wallace White

The U.S was far more directly involved in aiding Ukrainian forces against Russia than previously understood, a New York Times investigation revealed Monday.

American backing of Ukraine was an instrumental piece in forces of the eastern European nation wounding or killing more than 700,000 Russian soldiers during the course of the war, according to the NYT. Methods the U.S. used to aid Ukraine included giving target information while officially obfuscating their nature, dispatching American advisers close to the frontlines and sweeping oversight over its use of missile systems granted by officials.

One European intelligence official was taken aback as to how deep U.S. involvement was, telling the NYT that American officials had become “part of the kill chain.”

Dear Readers:
As a nonprofit, we are dependent on the generosity of our readers.

Please consider making a small donation of any amount here. Thank you!

Ukrainian officials met in Wiesbaden in Spring 2022, the headquarters of the U.S. European Command, to discuss strategy with U.S. forces and the extent to which the U.S. would aid the Ukrainians.

During the meeting, U.S. European Command settled with Ukrainian officials that they would reportedly dispense target locations as “points of interest” to the Ukrainians, not officially calling them “targets” as they believed the language would be too “provocative.”

“If you ever get asked the question, ‘Did you pass a target to the Ukrainians?’ you can legitimately not be lying when you say, ‘No, I did not,’” a U.S. official told the NYT. Most artillery strikes were carried out with the M777 Howitzer system, in part provided by the U.S.

Due to diplomatic risks, the Biden administration wanted to share intel in the most plausibly deniable way possible, with a total restriction on sharing the whereabouts of Russian military figures and targets on Russian soil, one senior U.S. official told the NYT. The information shared would have to adhere to NATO guidelines of intel sharing to not provoke the Russian’s ire against other nations in the alliance.

“Imagine how that would be for us if we knew that the Russians helped some other country assassinate our chairman,” the official told the NYT. “Like, we’d go to war.”

European Command also had sweeping oversight of the Ukrainian use of the HIMARS missile system, the Americans retaining the ability to shut off the activation key cards required to fire the missiles, according to the NYT. HIMARS strikes regularly resulted in hundreds of Russian deaths weekly.

Advisers regularly made visits to the frontlines of the war, referred to as “subject matter experts” in their official capacity, according to the NYT. Their official names only changed back to “advisers” once Ukrainian leadership changed, which was also followed by a threefold increase in advisers.

Despite the deep cooperation, there was often tension between the U.S. and Ukraine, with Kiev often accusing the Americans of being overbearing, while the Americans questioned why sometimes Ukrainians did not heed their advice, according to the NYT.