COVID-19
Bill Gates to stand trial in Netherlands COVID vaccine injury lawsuit

From LifeSiteNews
By Michael Nevradakis Ph. D., The Defender
A Netherlands court last week ruled that Bill Gates can stand trial in the Netherlands, in a case involving seven people injured by COVID-19 vaccines. Other defendants include Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, and the Dutch state.
A Netherlands court last week ruled thatĀ Bill Gates can stand trialĀ in the Netherlands, in a case involving seven people injured by COVID-19Ā vaccines.
According to Dutch newspaperĀ De Telegraaf, the seven ācorona skepticsāĀ sued GatesĀ last year, along with former Dutch prime minister and newly appointedĀ NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, and āseveral membersā of the Dutch governmentās COVID-19 āOutbreak Management Team.ā
Other defendants includeĀ Albert Bourla, Ph.D., CEO of Pfizer, and the Dutch state.
āBecause Bill Gatesā foundation was involved in combating the corona pandemic, he has also been summoned,āĀ De TelegraafĀ reported.
According to Dutch independent news outletĀ Zebra Inspiratie, the plaintiffs allege that Gates, through his representatives, deliberately misled them about the safety of theĀ COVID-19Ā shots, despite knowing āthat these injections wereĀ not safe and effective.ā
Dutch independent journalist Erica Krikke told The Defender that the seven plaintiffs ā whose names are redacted in the lawsuitās publicly available documents ā āare ordinary Dutch people, and they have been jabbed and after the jabs they got sick.ā
Krikke said that of the seven original plaintiffs, one has since died, leaving the other six plaintiffs to continue the lawsuit.
The lawsuit was filed in theĀ District Court of Leeuwarden. According toĀ De Telegraaf, āGates had objected because, according to him, the judges did not have jurisdiction.ā Accordingly, the court first āhad to rule in the so-called incident procedure,āĀ De Andere KrantĀ reported.
Zebra InspiratieĀ reported that the hearing in this āincident procedureā took place on Sept. 18 and that Gatesā representatives disputed jurisdiction, but not the claim.
According toĀ De Andere Krant, Gates was represented by theĀ Pels RijckenĀ law firm, based in The Hague, described as ātheĀ largest and the premier litigation law firmĀ in the Netherlands.ā Gates did not appear at the Sept. 18 hearing, but attorneys for Gates argued that the court āhad no jurisdiction over him because he lives in the United States.ā
However, in itsĀ Oct. 16 ruling, the Leeuwarden court ruled it does have jurisdiction over Gates.Ā De Andere KrantĀ reported that the court found āsufficient evidenceā that the claims against Gates and the other defendants are āconnectedā and based on the same ācomplex of facts.ā
Other defendants who reside outside of the Netherlands, including Bourla, did not challenge the courtās jurisdiction.
The court ruled Gates must pay attorneysā fees and additional legal costs totaling 1,406 euros (approximately $1,520). A hearing is scheduled for Nov. 27.
āEven if ā¦ your name is Bill Gates, you still have to go to courtā
In remarks shared withĀ De Andere Krant, Arno van Kessel, one of the plaintiffsā attorneys, welcomed the ruling. āIn its verdict, the court has clearly recorded the basis of our conclusions of claim,ā van Kessel said.
Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst told The Defender it is āquite interestingā that the plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in Leeuwarden instead of The Hague, where normally, all cases against the government related to COVID-19 are filed.
āIn general, COVID-19 court cases have been very unsuccessful in the Netherlands,ā Terhorst said. āThere is a slim chance it will be successful.ā
She added:
I think most judges support the COVID-19 vaccination agenda and will find it hard to believe the vaccinations have caused injuries. So, we have a long way to go, regardless of the case.
Krikke shared a more optimistic outlook, saying that the court sent a message that āeven if you are rich and your name is Bill Gates, you still have to go to court.ā
New Zealand-based independent journalistĀ Penny Marie, who has closely followed the proceedings in this case, told The Defender she hopes the Oct. 16 ruling āwill hopefully set a precedent and help plaintiffs in similar cases around the world regarding jurisdiction,ā in cases āwhere the defendant does not reside in the country of the plaintiff.ā
āFor parties who make claims against those involved in the implementation of theĀ Great ResetĀ and other international actions, such as the COVID-19 emergency response initiated by the WEF [World Economic Forum] and imposed on all U.N. member nations, I hope that this ruling provides an opportunity for others to follow suit,ā Marie added.
Father of vaccine-injured plaintiff made āemotional pleaā to the court
At the Sept. 18 hearing, plaintiffs also delivered statements. According toĀ Zebra Inspiratie, āOne of the victims, who is very ill, was also given the opportunity to make a plea. She was no longer able to speak and was represented by her father. It was anĀ emotional plea.ā
Krikke said the plaintiffās father told the court that his daughter, who was previously healthy, fell ill after getting the COVID-19 vaccine and could no longer speak, telling the judge that he āwould really like to speak to Bill Gates directlyā to ask him what happened to his daughter.
āAfter that, the judge was really quiet,ā Krikke said.
The Oct. 18 ruling also addressed the plaintiffsā claims aboutĀ Gatesā roleĀ in the WEFās āGreat Resetā project.
āThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is also affiliated with the World Economic Forum ā¦ an international organization whose statutory objective is to unite āleaders from business, governments, academia and society at large into a global community committed to improving the state of the world,āāĀ the rulingĀ states, adding:
This is a project aimed at the total reorganization of societies in all countries that are members of the United Nations ā¦ as described by [WEF founder and executive chairmanĀ Klaus Schwab] in his bookĀ Covid-19: The Great Reset. ā¦
Characteristic of this political ideology is that this forced and planned change is presented as justified by pretending that the world is suffering from major crises that can only be solved by centralized, hardĀ global intervention. One of these pretended major crises concerns the Covid-19 pandemic.
The ruling also states, āTheĀ Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationĀ isĀ affiliated with āGavi, the Vaccine Allianceā ā¦ an international partnership in the field of vaccinations between various public and private entities.ā
This article was originally published byĀ The DefenderĀ ā Childrenās Health Defenseās News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please considerĀ subscribing to The DefenderĀ orĀ donating to Childrenās Health Defense.
2025 Federal Election
Mark Carney refuses to clarify 2022 remarks accusing the Freedom Convoy of āseditionā

From LifeSiteNews
Mark Carney described the Freedom Convoy as an act of ‘sedition’ and advocated for the government to use its power to crush the non-violent protest movement.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney refused to elaborate on comments he made in 2022 referring to the anti-mandate Freedom Convoy protest as an act of āseditionā and advocating for the government to put an end to the movement.
āWell, look, I havenāt been a politician,ā Carney said when a reporter in Windsor, Ontario, where a Freedom Convoy-linkedĀ border blockade took place in 2022, asked, āWhat do you say to Canadians who lost trust in the Liberal government back then and do not have trust in you now?ā
āI became a politician a little more than two months ago, two and a half months ago,ā he said. āI came in because I thought this country needed big change. We needed big change in the economy.ā
Carneyās lack of an answer seems to be in stark contrast to the strong opinion he voiced in a February 7, 2022,Ā columnĀ published in theĀ Globe & MailĀ at the time of the convoy titled, āItās Time To End The Sedition In Ottawa.ā
In that piece, Carney wrote that the Freedom Convoy was a movement of āsedition,ā adding, āThatās a word I never thought Iād use in Canada. It means incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.ā
Carney went on to claim in the piece that if āleft uncheckedā by government authorities, the Freedom Convoy would āachieveā its āgoal of undermining our democracy.ā
Carney even targeted ā[a]nyone sending money to the Convoy,ā accusing them of āfunding sedition.ā
Internal emails from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) eventuallyĀ showedĀ that his definition of sedition were not in conformity with the definition under Canadaās Criminal Code, which explicitly lists the āuse of forceā as a necessary aspect of sedition.
āThe key bit is āuse of force,’ā one RCMP officer noted in the emails. āIām all about a resolution to this and a forceful one with us victorious but, from the facts on the ground, I donāt know weāre there except in a small number of cases.ā
Another officer replied with, āAgreed,ā adding that āIt would be a stretch to say the trucks barricading the streets and the air horns blaring at whatever decibels for however many days constitute the āuse of force.āā
The reality is that the Freedom Convoy was a peaceful event of public protest against COVID mandates, and not one protestor was charged with sedition. However, the Liberal government, then under Justin Trudeau, did take an approach similar to the one advocated for by Carney, invoking the Emergencies Act to clear-out protesters. Since then, a federal judge has ruled that such action was ānot justified.ā
Despite this, the two most prominent leaders of the Freedom Convoy, Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, still face aāÆpossibleāÆ10-year prison sentence for their role in the non-violent assembly. LifeSiteNews has reportedāÆextensivelyāÆon their trial.
COVID-19
17-year-old died after taking COVID shot, but Ontario judge denies his familyās liability claim

From LifeSiteNews
Ontario Superior Court Justice Sandra Antoniani ruled that the Department of Health had no ‘duty of care’ to individual members of the public in its pandemic response.
An Ontario judge dismissed a liability claim from a family of a high schooler who died weeks after taking the COVID shot.
According to aĀ publishedĀ report on March 26 byĀ Blacklockās Reporter, Ontario Superior Court Justice Sandra Antoniani ruled that the Department of Health had no āduty of careā to a Canadian teenager who died after receiving a COVID vaccine.
āThe plaintiffās tragedy is real, but there is no private law duty of care made out,ā Antoniani said.
āThere is no private law duty of care to individual members of the public injured by government core policy decisions in the handling of health emergencies which impact the general population,ā she continued.
In September 2021, 17-year-old Sean Hartman of Beeton, Ontario, passed away just three weeks after receiving a Pfizer-BioNtech COVID shot.
After his death, his family questioned if health officials had warned Canadians āthat a possible side effect of receiving a Covid-19 vaccine was death.ā The family took this petition to court but has been denied a hearing.
Antoniani alleged that āthe defendantsā actions were aimed at mitigating the health impact of a global pandemic on the Canadian public. The defendants deemed that urgent action was necessary.ā
āImposition of a private duty of care would have a negative impact on the ability of the defendants to prioritize the interests of the entire public, with the distraction of fear over the possibility of harm to individual members of the public, and the risk of litigation and unlimited liability,ā she ruled.
As LifeSiteNews previously reported, Dan Hartman, Seanās father,Ā filedĀ a $35.6 million lawsuit against Pfizer after his sonās death.
Hartmanās family is not alone in their pursuit of justice after being injured by the COVID shot. Canadaās Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP)Ā was launchedĀ in December 2020āÆafter the Canadian government gave vaccine makers a shield from liability regarding COVID-19 jab-related injuries.
However, only 103 claims of 1,859 have been approved to date, āwhere it has been determined by the Medical Review Board that there is a probable link between the injury and the vaccine, and that the injury is serious and permanent.ā
Thus far, VISP hasĀ paidĀ over $6 million to those injured by COVID injections, with some 2,000 claims remaining to be settled.
According to studies, post-vaccination heart conditions such as myocarditis are well documented in those,Ā especially young malesĀ who have received the Pfizer jab.
Additionally, aĀ recent studyĀ done by researchers with Canada-basedĀ Correlation Research in the Public InterestĀ showed that 17 countries have found a ādefinite causal linkā between peaks in all-cause mortality and the fast rollouts of the COVID shots as well as boosters.
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Joe Tay Says He Contacted RCMP for Protection, Demands Carney Fire MP Over āBountyā Remark
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Hong Kong-Canadian Groups Demand PM Carney Drop Liberal Candidate Over āBountyā Remark Supporting CCP Repression
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Poilievre To Create āCanada Firstā National Energy Corridor
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Alcohol tax and MP pay hike tomorrow (April 1)
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
China Election Interference – Parties Received Security Briefing Days Ago as SITE Monitors Threats to Conservative Candidate Joe Tay
-
2025 Federal Election2 days ago
Fixing Canadaās immigration system should be next governmentās top priority
-
2025 Federal Election1 day ago
Poilievre, Conservatives receive election endorsement from large Canadian trade union
-
Bruce Dowbiggin2 days ago
Are the Jays Signing Or Declining? Only Vladdy & Bo Know For Sure