Connect with us

illegal immigration

Biden/Harris made empty promises to stop migrants in Panama — but the flood continues

Published

8 minute read

A sign at the end of the notorious Darien Gap in Panama — where 1.5 million migrants have traveled since 2021.Photo by LUIS ACOSTA/AFP via Getty Images

From the New York Post

By Todd Bensman

On July 1, Panama’s new President José Raúl Mulino took office on an unprecedented promise to close a major route of illegal immigration — through which at least 1.5 million foreign nationals have poured through since 2021.

Mulino said he would close the infamous Darién Gap, a 70-mile roadless jungle wilderness that South American migrants traverse on their way north to the United States.

He secured a promise from the Biden-Harris administration to help accomplish this: money and possibly even planes to carry illegally arriving migrants back to their countries.

A map of the 70-mile route that migrants take on the Darien Gap while passing through Panama.

But nearly two months after the US pledged a “removal flights program” to support Panama, the aid is nowhere to be found and the immigrants, after sheltering in place at home or in Colombia to see if Panama might actually deport people, are starting to flow once again through the Darién Gap.

‘We need support’

“We’re waiting,” said a senior Panama government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the diplomatic sensitivity of the topic. “We are [ready] to do our part of the agreement but we need the resources. We don’t have the airplanes to move the big numbers we need to.”

The official said the lack of American follow-through is probably “political” but has become more urgent to counter a new wave of Venezuelans — long among the most numerous nationalities crossing through Panama — who are now fleeing a fresh round of political violence.

Panama wants to dramatically increase air expulsions of Venezuelans back to Colombia to “change their mindset” so that fewer will want to make the dangerous trek.

But the Panamanian official said his country can’t afford to go it alone much longer.

Migrants boarding a boat in Colombia to head to the Darien Gap.
Migrants boarding a boat in Colombia to head to the Darien Gap.CIS.ORG
A group of migrants sailing from Colombia to Panama.
A group of migrants sailing from Colombia to Panama.CIS.ORG
Migrants arriving in Panama.
Migrants arriving in Panama.CIS.ORG

“We understand that we need logistical support to reinforce the expulsion of migrants . . . so we can avoid the movement and the normal flow to the United States,” the official said. “We need to change the migration politics of the border of the United States so we can send a very clear message to the migrants.”

His comments follow a similar public nudge from Panama’s presidential palace.

“The ball is in their court; we have done everything we can do,” President Mulino said at an Aug. 9 press conference in Panama City, referring to the Biden-Harris White House. “The border is in Panama, not in Texas.”

Catch-&-release logic

The American delay in following through, given the latest Venezuela unrest — and also the paltry $6 million the White House reportedly offered Panama for air expulsions — is inexplicable, given that Panama’s newfound willingness to reduce US-bound immigration on its territory represents a golden opportunity for the administration.

Polling shows the border crisis figures large as a political liability for Harris.

But it is in keeping with a Biden-Harris administration that has worked overtime to increase illegal-border crossing.

Rather than discourage passage through the Darién Gap, the US worked with the previous Panamanian government to make it easier to get through.

Migrants walking along a jungle path while traveling from Colombia to Panama on May 9, 2024.
Migrants walking along a jungle path while traveling from Colombia to Panama on May 9, 2024.AP Photo/Ivan Valencia
Migrants riding a small boat on a river in Panama's Darien province on Oct. 6, 2023.
Migrants riding a small boat on a river in Panama’s Darien province on Oct. 6, 2023.AP Photo/Arnulfo Franco, File

In 2022, for instance, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Secretary of State Anthony Blinken pressured the Panamanian government to open a shorter sea and river route, built larger and new hospitality rest camps, and arranged for dozens of United Nations and nonprofit migrant advocacy groups to provide all manner of aid and assistance.

These moves induced hundreds of thousands more border crossers per year to make the trip.

As a direct result of Biden-Harris catch-and-release policies, the Darién Gap passage became a major factor in the worst mass migration crisis in US history, funneling millions of illegal immigrants north.

A woman carrying a child as she crosses the Acandi River in Colombia on Sept. 15, 2024.
A woman carrying a child as she crosses the Acandi River in Colombia on Sept. 15, 2024.AP Photo/Fernando Vergara
A migrant camp at the Reception Center for Migrant Care in Lajas Blanca, Panama on June 27, 2024.
A migrant camp at the Reception Center for Migrant Care in Lajas Blanca, Panama on June 27, 2024.Photo by MARTIN BERNETTI/AFP via Getty Images

Election pressure

Fewer than 20,000 economic immigrants per year ever passed through the Colombia-Panama passage before the Biden-Harris administration, yet 250,000 passed through it in 2022, 520,000 last year and a projected 800,000 by the end of 2024.

With the election looming, Biden did pressure Mexico to try to reduce the all-time-record border crossings of 10,000-to-14,000-a-day.

Panama's then-president-elect Jose Raul Mulino visiting the Reception Center for Migrant Care on June 28, 2024.
Panama’s then-president-elect Jose Raul Mulino visiting the Reception Center for Migrant Care on June 28, 2024.Photo by MARTIN BERNETTI/AFP via Getty Images

The outreach has helped ebb the tide slightly and avoided some of the more shocking pictures and videos from overwhelmed border checkpoints.

So why the delay with Panama?

Perhaps it’s because the border has been “solved” just enough for optics sake ahead of the election. But Kamala Harris has absolutely no intention of following through with tougher border policies if elected.

If Harris wins in November, she won’t have to unravel a commitment to actual deportations in Panama that neither she nor her progressive liberal base authentically support or want, and the Darién Gap superhighway that they support can remain wide open.

Todd Bensman, a senior national security fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, is the author of “Overrun: How Joe Biden Unleashed the Greatest Border Crisis in U.S. History.” Follow his progress through the Dairen Gap and Panama at CIS.org.

 

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Daily Caller

Mass Deportations, Cracking Down On Sanctuary Cities And More: Here’s What Trump Has In Store For Immigration

Published on

From the Daily Caller News Foundation 

By Jason Hopkins

President-elect Donald Trump will immediately crack down on border security and interior immigration enforcement upon his return to office, immigration experts and other allies of the upcoming administration say.

Trump decisively won re-election to the White House, having secured 295 electoral votes and drawing more than 73 million supporters to the voting booth on Election Day, per the latest results as of Friday. The victory brings into sharper focus his campaign platform, which includes incredibly hawkish border security proposals. 

The president-elect, who already established himself as a stalwart on border enforcement during his first term in office, made a slate of campaign promises on border security over the past year, such as completing the U.S.-Mexico border wall, reviving the Remain in Mexico program, bringing back the travel ban and hiring more Border Patrol agents.

Trump also introduced a number of more novel pledges while on the campaign trail, such as a vow to conduct the “largest deportation program in American history” and a plan to end birthright citizenship for those born on American soil by illegal migrant parents.

Trump’s rhetoric and past reputation may have already helped mitigate the immigration crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border. Upon hearing that he was elected to a second term, numerous migrants in southern Mexico expressed hopelessness and opted to leave a U.S.-bound caravan they were traveling in, with a Mexican official noting that the incoming caravan of roughly 3,000 migrants shrunk by roughly half its size after Trump declared victory.

Immigration experts who spoke with the Daily Caller News Foundation, while cautioning that anti-borders groups will fight the upcoming administration tooth and nail, said the American people can certainly expect a return to the tough immigration measures that were seen in Trump’s first term.

“America can expect the new Trump administration to do what the prior Trump Administration did: To apply the Immigration and Nationality Act, as written by Congress. And to restore the rule of law, both to the Southern border and to the legal immigration system,” said Matt O’Brien, investigations director at the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI), a conservative legal group in Washington, D.C., that pushes for stricter immigration policies.

“The overall goal will be protecting the public safety and national security of the United States; as well as protecting migrants — especially vulnerable women and children — from exploitation by smugglers and traffickers,” O’Brien continued. “The only thing that needs to be done to ‘fix’ the immigration system is to use the laws on the books as Congress intended. And President Trump will do that.”

As for laws set by Congress, several lawmakers in the House and Senate told the DCNF that they are ready and waiting with their own legislation once Trump re-enters the Oval Office.

Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz, for example, said he looks forward to passing his Justice for Jocelyn Act in the next Congress, an homage to a 12-year-old Houston girl who was allegedly sexually assaulted and murdered in June by two illegal migrants. The bill would mandate the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to “exhaust all reasonable efforts” to keep an illegal migrant in custody before releasing them into the interior of the country, according to the legislation.

Should an illegal migrant be released, however, the legislation would call for continuous GPS monitoring until their removal from the U.S. or the completion of their immigration proceedings. Texas GOP Rep. Troy Nehls has sponsored the same legislation on the House side.

“In a second Trump administration, the House Committee on Homeland Security will do everything possible to help the United States return to an era of secure borders and robust interior enforcement,” GOP Rep. Mark Green, who serves as chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, stated to the DCNF. “Ending the Biden-Harris border crisis will require two things — policy changes to end the flow of inadmissible aliens into our country, and more funding for interior enforcement to demonstrate that there are consequences to entering illegally.”

The election results so far show Congress will likely be in a position to support the upcoming Trump administration’s immigration agenda. The GOP secured control of the Senate after flipping four different Senate seats, and while there is no definitive winner of the House majority yet, Republicans appear to have a slight edge as votes continue to trickle in.idential nominee U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) tours the U.S. Border Wall on August 01, 2024 in Montezuma Pass, Arizona. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

While it’ up for debate on exactly what bills Trump ultimately signs into law or executive orders he takes, it’s certain that the incoming president will face courtroom fights over whatever he decides to do.

“Any action that President Trump would take, someone is going to sue,” Eric Ruark, research director for NumbersUSA, stated to the DCNF about the expected barrage of court challenges the Trump administration will receive once it embarks on its immigration agenda. “It depends on whether you find a judge that will rule against him, and it may take a long time for these things to play out.”

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed more than 400 legal actions against Trump and his administration since 2016, according to their count, and these lawsuits targeted a vast number of his first term’s immigration priorities. The massive liberal organization, and others like it, say they’re ready to battle the Republican again now that he will be returning to office.

Even President Joe Biden, who entered office on a pledge to undo Trump’s hawkish border policies, was sued by immigrant rights groups when he finally attempted to end the illegal immigration crisis by issuing an executive order in June that largely shut down crossings at the southern border.

The Biden-Harris administration oversaw record-levels of border encounters during its time in office, with illegal border crossings in fiscal year 2023 and fiscal year 2024 being the worst in history, according to CBP data. The border crisis began after the administration in its first year took nearly 90 executive actions that specifically targeted Trump’s first-term immigration policies.

While some of Trump’s more ambitious goals will take time and likely endure legal challenges, there are swift administrative actions that the president-elect will likely take on day one of his administration, Ruark noted.

“Ending the parole abuse,” he said, referring to the CHNV program and others like it that have paroled into the U.S. more than half a million foreign nationals during the Biden administration. Around 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans have been flown into the country under the CHNV initiative.

“On day one I think he would end those parole programs,” Ruark said. “And people who come in under parole were being allowed — and I guess they still are — to sponsor other people to come in, which is a complete violation of the law. So that is something Trump can end on day one.”

He also listed the termination of the CBP One app — which has allowed roughly one million foreign nationals to schedule appointments at ports of entry since it was first rolled out — and the withholding of federal funds from sanctuary cities as other unilateral actions that Trump will likely embark on immediately.

A successful immigration agenda will also hinge in large part on cooperation from Mexico, which stands in between the U.S. southern border and the countless illegal migrants who wish to cross it every year. The former Mexican president, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, ramped up his government’s crackdown on U.S.-bound illegal migration, giving relief to Biden as he dealt with historic border encounters.

Claudia Sheinbaum, Lopez Obrador’s successor, took office in October, but questions remain on how the leftist Mexican leader will get along with Trump. Sheinbaum on Thursday confirmed that she had a “cordial” phone call with the president-elect following his victory, but did not go into further detail on what was discussed. A spokesperson for Trump’s campaign declined to comment on what was said during the phone call when reached by the DCNF.

Regardless of legal pushback by liberal organizations or a lack of cooperation from his Mexican counterparts, immigration experts do anticipate Trump to be even tougher on immigration than he was in his first term.

“I would be surprised and very disappointed if not,” Ruark said.

Continue Reading

Daily Caller

Court Shoots Down Biden Admin’s Mass Amnesty Order For Hundreds Of Thousands Of Illegal Migrants

Published on

From the Daily Caller News Foundation 

By Jason Hopkins

The Biden-Harris administration suffered a major defeat in federal court on Thursday amid its fight to provide amnesty for up to half a million illegal migrants living in the United States.

President Joe Biden’s executive order that attempted to provide a pathway to citizenship for hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants married to American citizens is unlawful, a federal judge in the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Texas ruled on Thursday. Biden’s order, which was first announced over the summer, was challenged by the Texas attorney general and a slate of other GOP-led states.

“Since day one, the Biden-Harris Administration has dedicated itself to the decimation of our immigration system and the erasure of our borders,” stated Gene Hamilton, the executive director of America First Legal, a conservative organization that led the court challenge against the order. “Time and again, the states stood up.

“And today, the great State of Texas and the courageous Ken Paxton, alongside a coalition of other brave Attorneys General, succeeded in stopping an illegal program that would have provided amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens and paved the path for the largest administrative amnesty in American history,” Hamilton continued. “We are proud to stand alongside these patriots in defense of our great nation.”

Biden first unveiled the executive order in June during a White House event commemorating the 12-year anniversary of the Deferred Action of Childhood Arrivals (DACA), the last major amnesty program initiated by the federal government. The order — dubbed the Keeping Families Together program — allowed illegal migrant spouses of U.S. citizens to apply for lawful permanent residence without having to leave the country first, according to a fact sheet of the plan released by the administration.

Under current law, illegal immigrants can apply for legal status after they have married a U.S. citizen, but they are required to leave the country in order to move forward with the process. However, Biden’s order attempted to expand a statutory authority known as “parole-in-place”, allowing those noncitizens to wait out the application process while remaining in the country.

Illegal migrants approved for the program would not only be given lawful permanent residence and work permits, but also a pathway to citizenship, according to the plan. The White House expected the order to affect as many as half a million illegal migrants, but America First Legal placed that estimate at more than one million illegal immigrants.

America First Legal partnered with Texas and Idaho, along with a coalition of 14 state attorneys general in August to sue the Biden-Harris administration to block the amnesty order. Later that month, the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Texas put a pause on the program, but Biden had vowed to keep fighting.

On Thursday, the court ultimately ruled that the Department of Homeland Security lacked statutory authority to carry out the order.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation.

(Featured Image Media Credit: Screen Capture/CSPAN)

Continue Reading

Trending

X