Connect with us

DEI

Top Canadian university posts job listing that excludes white heterosexual men

Published

5 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

The University of British Columbia says the new job is ‘restricted to members of the following federally designated groups: people with disabilities, indigenous people, racialized people, women, and people from minoritized gender identity groups.’

One of Canada’s most well-known universities has posted a job opening for a new research chair position but has essentially barred non-homosexual white men from applying for the job.Ā 

A recent job posting for the position of ā€œTier 1 Canada Research Chair in Oral Cancer Researchā€ at theĀ University of British Columbia (UBC) Vancouver campus hasĀ explicitly mentionedĀ that those who don’t meet its so-called diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) requirements need not apply.Ā Ā 

The UBC job posting was published on May 21, and notes that the seven-year contract for the chair role has with it certain ā€œeligibility requirements,ā€ such as candidates having to demonstrate a track record of ā€œsupporting equity, diversity, and inclusion.ā€Ā Ā 

According to UBC, the selection for the role will be ā€œrestricted to members of the following federally designated groups: people with disabilities, indigenous people, racialized people, women, and people from minoritized gender identity groups.ā€Ā 

This rules out straight white men from applying for the role. UBC uses itsĀ Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Action PlanĀ as well as theĀ B.C. HumanĀ Rights CodeĀ as validation for its job requirements.Ā Ā 

The UBC claims that its current faculty is underrepresented by those who ā€œself-identifyā€ as having a disability, thus it notes that a person from this category is ā€œpreferential.ā€Ā 

To ensure that straight white men do not apply for the job, the UBC is also mandating that anyone who applies for the role must first conduct what it calls anĀ ā€œequity survey.ā€Ā 

ā€œCandidates from these groups must self-identify as belonging to one or more of the designated equity groups to be considered for the position,ā€ notes UBC.Ā 

According to the UBC, ā€œEquity and diversity are essential to academic excellence.ā€Ā 

Musk: Is the even legal?Ā Ā 

As news of the UBC job posting spread on social media, X owner Elon MuskĀ chimed inĀ to comment on the matter, writing on June 3, ā€œIs this legal in Canada?ā€ in reply to aĀ sarcastic postĀ from Quebec-based academic Gad Saad mocking the job posting.Ā Ā 

ā€œYes! Oral cancer research has long been dominated by white heterosexual males. Imagine the progress that can be made if the relevant research were conducted by Trans People of Color. Thank you @UBC for your epistemological courage in fighting against the scourge of White Heterosexual Science,ā€Ā sarcastically wroteĀ Saad on June 3 on X.Ā Ā 

In recent years, there has been a notable increase in the promotion of so-called DEI requirements on employers, because of a push for it from the federal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.Ā 

Indeed, LifeSiteNews recentlyĀ reported onĀ how Trudeau’s Liberal government has spent over $30 million DEI affiliated contracts amongst many federal ministries since January 2019.   

When it comes to DEI, Musk has been a formidable opponent to the discriminatory hiring practices. In Canada, the only main party speaking out against it is the People’s Party of Canada, under its leader Maxime Bernier. He has been outspoken against radical gender ideology repeatedly over the last few years as well as the COVID jabs and mandates.Ā 

In April,Ā he announced a new party policy officially denouncing the so-called DEI agenda, saying it is nothing more than a ā€œfundamentally racist, sexist, and discriminatory ideologyā€ that ā€œdivides Canadians.ā€Ā 

Bernier told LifeSiteNews recently that the only way to stop the ā€œradical policiesā€ of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) agenda – which he calls a combination of ā€œofficial discrimination against white heterosexual malesā€ and the ā€œpromotion of weird mental illnessesā€ – is for people to fight back against those seeking to undermine ā€œtraditional norms and values.ā€Ā 

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

Aristotle Foundation

The University of Saskatchewan is on an ideological mission

Published on

Aristotle Foundation Home

By Peter MacKinnon

The program is part of an ideological crusade within our universities, one that includes identity-based admissions and faculty appointments, and discourages those who differ from speaking out or taking issue with its direction.

It needs to end

I must disclose my background here; I was employed by the University of Saskatchewan for 40 years including 13 years as president. The institution’s distinctive origins combined the development of liberal education with a responsibility to build the province’s agricultural industry, and it did the latter with world-class agricultural programs and research institutes, and with faculty and students of many backgrounds from around the globe.

Now, we are told, the academic personnel in this worldly environment requireĀ mandatory trainingĀ on racism: an Anti-Racism/Anti-Oppression and Unconscious Bias Faculty Development Program. It is compulsory; those who decline its offerings will be shut out of collegial processes previously thought to be their right as tenured faculty.

It was earlier reported that the program emerged from collective bargaining at the initiative of the university’s faculty union; if so, this does not relieve the administration from responsibility; it signed the collective agreement.

ā€œProgramā€ is a euphemism. It is a propaganda module in which scholarly expertise and balance will not be found. It does not appear that the instructor has a university academic post and the program’s ideological hue is revealed in the two required readings, one by Idle No More co-founder Sheelah McLean whose theme is that the success of Saskatchewan’s white people is built on ā€œ150 years of racist, sexist and homophobic colonial practices.ā€

The second is by five ā€œracializedā€ faculty who claim that Canadian university systems are rigged to privilege white people. Dissent, contrary views or even nuance are neither expected nor tolerated here. Opinions that are different are not on the reading list.

One participant, a law professor, was invited to leave after 30 minutes because he did not lend his voice to its purpose and orientation; he revealed that he was present because it was required. The purpose of the program is indoctrination and there is no room for dissent.

The program is part of an ideological crusade within our universities, one that includes identity-based admissions and faculty appointments, and discourages those who differ from speaking out or taking issue with its direction.

It is not present to the same degree in all of these institutions, but it is visible in most and prominent in many. It disparages merit, distorts our history and rests on the proposition that a white majority population has perpetrated a wide and pervasive racist agenda against others. It takes its conclusions as self-evident and not requiring evidence. It is authoritarian and intolerant, and should have no place in institutions committed to excellence and the search for truth.

The question, of course, is what is to be done. There is a view that ā€œthis too shall pass;ā€ it is a fad that will recede in time.

But we must note, these are public institutions supported by tax dollars, and by the contributions of time and money by alumni and supporters. We should not tolerate their politicization and sidetracking of the academic mission in favour of the ideology on display here. The pushback should begin with governments and extend to others who care about these vital institutions.

But first the ideology must be recognized. There is no public uproar and little clamour from within the institutions; dissenting professors and students fear that negative professional and personal repercussions may follow. University-governing bodies stand down or away, not wanting to be involved in controversy. Resistance must come from outside the institutions: governments must insist that the propaganda must end, and they should be joined by alumni, supporters and the general public. The credibility of our universities depends on their willingness to say no.

Peter MacKinnon has served as president of three Canadian universities and is a senior fellow at theĀ Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy.Ā Photo: WikiCommons

Continue Reading

2025 Federal Election

Carney Liberals pledge to follow ā€˜gender-based goals analysis’ in all government policy

Published on

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

‘We will continue to update the GBA+ tool to ensure it reflects the identities and values of all Canadians, including diversity as a core value.’

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal Party is promising to effectively mandate that all government policies and initiatives be measured using ā€œGender Based Analysesā€ before being approved and implemented.

The Liberal’s ā€œCanada Strongā€ electionĀ platform, under the Gender Based Analyses (GBA) tab, pledges to ā€œensure that every measure in this platform will be implemented with a full GBA+ analysis – so that we can continue to build Canada strong, for all Canadians.ā€

ā€œA Mark Carney-led government will support and champion all Canadians, including by reviewing policies and programs using an intersectional lens. We will continue to update the GBA+ tool to ensure it reflects the identities and values of all Canadians, including diversity as a core value.ā€

The GBA tab also mentions ā€œ2SLGBTQI+ peopleā€ four times, three of which are related to funding promises.

It notes that a Carney-led government would protect ā€œthe valuesā€ the Charter of Rights and Freedoms was ā€œfounded on – which are under threat – and ensuring the protection of women, people with disabilities, racialized and Indigenous communities, and 2SLGBTQI+ people.ā€

Carney already stated his government would provideĀ sterilizing puberty blockersĀ to children ā€œwithout exception,ā€ calling harmful ā€œtransitioningā€ surgeries and chemical ā€œtreatmentsā€ a ā€œfundamental right.ā€

While campaigning to become Liberal Party leader, Carney had also promised that his government wouldĀ pursue an agendaĀ of ā€œinclusivenessā€ to counter U.S. President Donald Trump’s more socially conservative agenda.

His promise to promote ā€œinclusivenessā€ in Canada in opposition to Trump’s agenda came only days after former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal governmentĀ promised an extraĀ $41.5 million in taxpayer funds to advance 106 pro-LGBT projects ā€œacross Canada.ā€

Carney, whose ties to globalist groups have had Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre call him the World Economic Forum’s ā€œgolden boyā€.

Canadians will head to the polls on April 28.

Continue Reading

Trending

X