International
UN attacks stay-at-home motherhood as ‘gender inequality’
From LifeSiteNews
By Matt Lamb
“Care work remains undervalued and underpaid. The monetary value of women’s unpaid care work globally is at least $10.8 trillion annually, three times the size of the world’s tech industry”
Stay-at-home moms, and mothers in general, are victims of “gender inequality” and “gender-based violence” because of their dedication to their children, a far-left United Nations commission claimed.
The 68th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women reportedly focused heavily on “unpaid care work,” according to journalist Kimberly Ells, writing at Mercator.
“I spent a week listening to an endless parade of events focused almost exclusively on ending poverty by eliminating ‘unpaid care work,’” Ells wrote.
“What is ‘unpaid care work,’ you might ask? It is work done in the home without specific monetary payment. Most people would call that kind of work simply being alive,” she wrote. “It could also be called running your own castle.”
The United Nations’ 2023 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals lists “unpaid care work” as something that needs to be addressed.
“But the forces that converged at the United Nations this spring called it an atrocity,” she said. “To be an ‘unpaid care worker’—especially if you’re a woman—was seen as an affront to human decency,” she said. “And because on average women worldwide do more labour in the home than men, people in UN circles call this ‘gender inequality,’ ‘gender injustice,’ and even ‘gender-based violence.’”
Ells reported that the commission members wanted taxpayer-funded daycare, an idea she pointed out has Marxist roots.
While Karl Marx is most famous for being an opponent of capitalism, he was supportive of getting women working and out of the home, as was Friedrich Engels, who continued his advocacy after Marx’s death.
“In The Family, Private Property and State, Engels reiterated Marx’s argument that women could only achieve equality when ‘both possess legally complete equality of rights,’” International Socialism previously wrote.
“‘Then it will be plain that the first condition for the liberation of the wife is to bring the whole female sex back into public industry and that this in turn demands the abolition of the monogamous family as the economic unit of society,’” an article at the communist website stated, quoting Engels.
A 2019 United Nation’s Children’s Fund news release has demanded “universal childcare,” stating, “Universal access to affordable, quality childcare from the end of parental leave until a child’s entry into the first grade of school, including before- and after-care for young children and pre-primary programs [should be provided].”
The United Nations’ entities regularly push the idea that women are victims of “unpaid care work,” backing up Ells’ reporting for Mercator.
“On average, women spend around three times more time on unpaid care and domestic work than men,” a March 7 story at UN News stated. “The gendered disparities in unpaid care work are a profound driver of inequality, restricting women’s and girls’ time and opportunities for education, decent paid work, public life, rest and leisure.”
“Care work remains undervalued and underpaid. The monetary value of women’s unpaid care work globally is at least $10.8 trillion annually, three times the size of the world’s tech industry,” the UN blog claimed.
A November 2023 report suggested “climate change” is linked to this problem.
“The gender gap in power and leadership positions remains entrenched, and, at the current rate of progress, the next generation of women will still spend on average 2.3 more hours per day on unpaid care and domestic work than men,” a September 2023 UN report warned.
Women don’t want to be out of the household full-time
However, while the UN sees women at home taking care of their children and domestic duties as a problem – and daycare as a solution – moms do not.
“Only 32% of mothers prefer full-time work,” the Institute for Family Studies wrote in 2020, summarizing other polls.
Massive government subsidies for family leave and daycare do not appear to change the numbers, according to IFS’ report.
In Ireland, for example, 61% of mothers said they prefer part-time work, while another 12% said they prefer to not work at all.
Only 23% said they want to work full-time. Yet Ireland offers 45 hours per week of subsidized childcare.
Children being raised by a stay-at-home mom has also been linked to better school performance and fewer emotional problems.
International
U.S. Claims Western Hemispheric Domination, Denies Russia Security Interests On Its Own Border
By John Leake
U.S. launches military strikes against Venezuela and seizes Maduro while CIA escalates involvement in attacking Russian refineries.
I woke up this morning and saw the news that, last night, the U.S. launched a military operation against Venezuela and swiftly captured President Nicholas Maduro. The Trump administration released the following image of the detained man on board a U.S. military aircraft.
As I drank my morning coffee, my thoughts drifted not to Venezuela, but to the French diplomat and political philosopher, Alexis de Tocqueville, who visited America 1831-1832 to study our prison system. Along the way, he made many observations of American society, which he later presented in his book, Democracy in America, published in two volumes in 1835 and 1840.
The U.S. is now hauling Nicolas Maduro back to New York to stand trial for various offenses. The Justice Department has cited the legal precedent of the Panamanian dictator, Manuel Noriega, who was seized by a U.S. military raid in 1990 and hauled back to Miami to stand trial for various charges.
To President Trump’s credit, he isn’t indulging in too much humbug virtue-signaling about this military action. In his statements to the press, he has already mentioned that the U.S. will now be “very strongly involved in Venezuela’s oil industry.”
Apparently aware of the incongruity of taking out Maduro while leaving the (far more powerful) Mexican cartels intact on our own border, Trump said, “something is gonna have to be done with Mexico.”
Tocqueville would have doubtless remarked that the American people should do something about their own monstrous addiction to narcotics and stimulants before they self-righteously fulminate against the depravity of their suppliers.
This is the moral and spiritual equivalent of a morbidly obese sugar addict railing about the depravity of Archer Daniels Midland and Cargill and demanding that their high fructose corn syrup refineries be bombed.
Speaking of bombing refineries: A few days ago the New York Times published a report about the CIA’s escalating involvement in helping Ukraine to target Russian oil refineries.
Additionally, the US State Department re-issued an urgent advisory warning Americans not to travel to Russia. The renewed advisory instructs American citizens currently in Russia to depart immediately, citing the danger associated with the ongoing war with Ukraine.
Back in Feb. 2022, when Russia launched its military operation against Ukraine, many Americans were appalled that Russia would violate the territorial sovereignty of its neighboring country, even though it has long been understood by anyone paying attention that the CIA had been meddling in Ukraine since 2005, and that NATO had been updating and preparing the Ukrainian army for war with Russian since 2014, when the CIA assisted in overthrowing Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, who was in favor of good Ukrainian-Russian relations.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly stated—most notably in his Feb. 6, 2024 interview with Tucker Carlson—that Russia would like to have friendly and cooperative relations with the United States, but achieving this will require that the United States recognize the legitimate interests of the Russian people and state.
With last night’s attacks on Venezuela, the Trump administration reasserted the full force of the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, in which President James Monroe stated in his annual address to Congress that the U.S. would not tolerate European meddling in the Western Hemisphere.
The U.S. invoked the Monroe Doctrine when it supported the overthrow and execution of the French backed Emperor Maximilian of Mexico, even though he was a thoroughly decent and liberal minded man.
To express my personal view of the matter: I agree with Rochefoucauld’s view that war is always about a kingdom or nation trying to secure and extend its interests. He was extremely skeptical of all moral justifications for war. Great powers want to expand—they want what other people have—and they are therefore extremely suspicious when other great powers show up in their backyard.
The U.S. sees Venezuela as a vital strategic asset with the largest proven oil reserves on earth. The U.S. government perceives Maduro’s regime to be dysfunctional and ideologically misaligned with U.S. interests, and therefore wants to replace him with a U.S. puppet regime that will open the country and its vast mineral assets to exploit them in a strategic partnership with the U.S.
I suppose this is all fine and well, but to be completely fair and honest, how can the U.S. government reassert the Monroe Doctrine, claiming Western Hemispheric domination, while denying that Russia has legitimate security interests in a border region of ethnic Russians that starts 280 miles from Moscow?
When contemplating this, consider that Venezuela is 2000 miles from Miami and poses zero military threat to the United States.
It seems to me that the Trump administration should stop applying such a crass and extreme double standard and immediately recognize Russia’s legitimate security interests. This means immediately ending CIA operations in Ukraine and terminating all support for the corrupt Zelensky regime.
Author’s Note: If you found this post interesting and informative, please become a paid subscriber to our newsletter. For just $5.00 per month, you can support us in our efforts to investigate and report what is going on in our bizarre world.
Subscribe to FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse).
For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
Energy
The U.S. Just Removed a Dictator and Canada is Collateral Damage
Early this morning, the United States says it carried out a ground raid supported by air strikes inside Venezuela, reportedly involving elite U.S. forces, including Delta Force, and removed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores from the country.
President Donald Trump confirmed the operation publicly and stated that the United States intends to “run Venezuela” during a transition period, explicitly including control over the country’s oil sector. That single statement should alarm Canada far more than any diplomatic condemnation ever could.
Kelsi Sheren is a reader-supported publication.
To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
While this move may be justified on moral or strategic grounds for the U.S., it is unequivocally bad news for Canada, really really bad. Canada’s energy position just weakened significantly and now Canada’s leverage with the United States has always rested on one simple fact: the U.S. needed Canadian oil.
Not liked it. Needed it.
Canada became Washington’s largest and most reliable foreign energy supplier not because it was cheap, fast, or efficient but because alternatives were unstable, sanctioned, or politically toxic. Venezuela was one of those alternatives.
It isn’t anymore.
If the U.S. succeeds in stabilizing Venezuelan oil production under its influence, Canada loses something it cannot easily replace and wish it did sooner, strategic indispensability. When your biggest customer gains options, your negotiating power not only shrinks, it completely disappears.
Venezuelan crude is largely heavy oil, the same category as much of Canada’s oil sands production. Many U.S. refineries, especially along the Gulf Coast, are designed to process heavy crude. For years, sanctions and mismanagement kept Venezuelan barrels off the market. Canadian heavy helped fill that gap. That advantage just cracked open. If Venezuelan supply re-enters global markets under U.S. oversight, Canadian oil faces more competition, downward pressure on prices, wider discounts for heavy crude and reduced urgency for new Canadian infrastructure. Urgency that Mark Carney refused to see was needed.
Canada’s oil is already expensive to extract and transport. It is already burdened by regulatory delays, pipeline bottlenecks, and political hostility at home. Now it faces a rival with larger reserves, lower production costs, shorter shipping routes and U.S. strategic backing
That is not a fair fight, but the liberals put us in this position and only have themselves to blame. Ottawa officially has no cards left to play. Canada’s response options are beyond limited and that’s the real problem.
Ottawa cannot meaningfully condemn the U.S. without risking trade and defence relations. It cannot influence Venezuelan reconstruction. It cannot outcompete Venezuelan oil on cost and it has spent years undermining its own energy sector in the name of climate virtue signalling. This is just the snake eating it’s tail and now realizing its proper fucked.
Canada is watching a major shift in global energy power from the sidelines, with no leverage and no contingency plan. This is the cost of mistaking morality for strategy. This is the cost of an ego gone unchecked.
Canada likes to tell itself that being stable, ethical, and predictable guarantees relevance. It doesn’t, Canada isn’t even in the game anymore it just hasn’t realized it. It only works when your partner has no better options.
The U.S. did not remove a communist dictator in Venezuela to protect Canadian interests. It did it to secure American interests energy, influence, and control. Thats what a real leader does, puts it’s country and it’s citizens first.
Canada’s reliability is now a nice bonus, not a necessity. That shift will show up quietly in trade negotiations, in infrastructure decisions and how quickly Canadian concerns get brushed aside. No dramatic break. Just less attention. Less urgency. Less patience and soon enough Canada won’t be invited to the table to even begin the conversation. Canada has just been down graded to the kids table.
This moment didn’t begin today. It began when Canada failed to build pipelines, ego drove away energy investment, allowed its regulatory system to become a chokehold and treated its largest export sector as an embarrassment.
While Ottawa debated optics, the U.S. planned for contingencies. Today was one of them.
The removal of a communist dictator in Venezuela may be a massive victory for it’s citizen and a strategic win for the United States but for Canada, it is a warning shot. Canada just became more optional in a world that punishes irrelevance quickly and quietly.
Being polite won’t save us. Being virtuous won’t save us.
Only being necessary ever did and today, Canada no longer became necessary.
KELSI SHEREN
– – – – – – – – – – – –
One Time Donation! – Paypal – https://paypal.me/
Buy me a coffee! – https://buymeacoffee.com/
Let’s connect!
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/@
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/
Substack: https://substack.com/@
TikTok – https://x.com/KelsiBurns
-
Energy1 day agoRulings could affect energy prices everywhere: Climate activists v. the energy industry in 2026
-
Digital ID1 day agoThe Global Push for Government Mandated Digital IDs And Why You Should Worry
-
Bruce Dowbiggin1 day agoThe Rise Of The System Engineer: Has Canada Got A Prayer in 2026?
-
International1 day agoMaduro says he’s “ready” to talk
-
International6 hours ago“Captured and flown out”: Trump announces dramatic capture of Maduro
-
International1 day agoLOCKED AND LOADED: Trump threatens U.S. response if Iran slaughters protesters
-
International6 hours agoTrump Says U.S. Strike Captured Nicolás Maduro and Wife Cilia Flores; Bondi Says Couple Possessed Machine Guns
-
Business6 hours agoVacant Somali Daycares In Viral Videos Are Also Linked To $300 Million ‘Feeding Our Future’ Fraud






