Josh Andrus - Project Confederation
Project Confederation pushing for a repeal of the carbon tax
News release from Project Confederation
Last week, Justin Trudeau made obvious what many of us have been saying for years – his carbon tax is all about politics, not the environment.
His Liberal government made a deeply political decision to exempt home heating oils from Canada’s carbon tax, right after promising they would never do such a thing.
“There will be no carve-out for a province. How fair would it be for the rest of the federation if we started carving out exceptions for provinces?”
Those were the words of Environment Minister, Steven Guilbeault, just a few weeks ago.
But with his poll numbers in freefall, and pressure mounting internally from his own Liberal MPs, the Prime Minister has abandoned his own signature policy.
If you already agree with us that the Carbon Tax
should be repealed, click here to sign our petition.
Otherwise, read on for more on why we think this is important.
The decision is outrageous for two reasons:
First – the vast, vast majority of Canadians who use home heating oil to heat their homes live in the Atlantic provinces – an area of the country where the Liberals are particularly struggling in the polls and have a large number of seats to defend in the next election
Second – home heating oil is actually worse for the environment than natural gas!
So, for those keeping track at home – the government announced they were giving a tax exemption to one (and only one) part of the country – the part where they desperately need more votes, and the fuel they’re exempting is worse for the environment than the fuel they’re refusing to exempt.
This surely must be one of the most blatant attempts at vote-buying we’ve ever seen, from a government looking to bribe its way back into power come election time.
Now, normally, this would be the point where the government would come out and deny that the decision was in any way political, make up some silly excuse that most of us can see right through, but which they plan to repeat often enough that some people will forget what they did.
Instead, though, they actually admitted it.
Heck, they went so far as to brag about it!
Rural Economic Development Minister, Gudie Hutchings, went on CTV’s Question Period to put the matter to rest but, instead, exposed the partisan regional motivations behind the move.
“I can tell you, the (Liberal) Atlantic caucus was vocal with what they’ve heard from their constituents, and perhaps they need to elect more Liberals in the Prairies so that we can have that conversation, as well.”
Unbelievable.
Can you imagine if a conservative federal government exempted Albertans (and only Albertans) from having to pay federal GST?
Or if a federal NDP/Bloc government gave Quebecers (and only Quebecers) an exemption from having to pay federal income tax?
The resentment this will cause in different parts of the country is incalculable.
It underscores the Liberals’ complete disregard for the Supreme Court as well.
One of the main arguments the Liberals used at the Supreme Court when attempting to defend the carbon tax as constitutional was that it was a non-political, neutral charge, applied fairly and evenly right across the country.
Clearly, that’s no longer true.
The response from the Alberta and Saskatchewan governments has been very strong.
In Saskatchewan, Scott Moe announced that SaskEnergy – the Crown corporation that supplies natural gas in the province – will no longer be collecting the carbon tax on home heating bills, nor remitting the carbon tax to the federal government.
“This is the most divisive federal government Canada has ever had. It’s not about climate change, not about fairness or about families, it’s only about votes.”
In Alberta, the Legislative Assembly opened with the Throne Speech, which put the problem in plain terms:
“There are powerful forces in our country, including in the federal government, that believe our province must fundamentally alter our provincial economy and way of life.”
Even the Alberta NDP – typically a doormat for the federal government – spoke out against the decision.
NDP leader Rachel Notley agreed that the change was unfair to the west, saying:
“If Atlantic Canada is being given a break on their home-heating bills, Alberta should be too.”
You know it’s going badly for the federal government when even Rachel Notley’s NDP is joining the UCP in criticizing them.
The carbon tax has always been unfair to western Canadians.
It is an extra cost at every level of the economy, from the cost of heating our homes to the cost of driving our vehicles, and it is a major tax on the cost of the goods and services we all consume.
And that cost is disproportionately felt by western Canadians because we naturally use more energy per capita, thanks to our geography and climate.
Instead of another carve-out, though, the solution is simpler.
It’s time to do what should have been done years ago.
It’s time to Repeal The Carbon Tax.
If you agree, please sign this petition calling on the federal government to Repeal The Carbon Tax immediately:
Over the past four years, we have been relentless in our efforts to achieve a fairer Constitutional deal.
To see Ottawa so blatantly applying regional bias to its environmental onslaught is clear evidence that we need to be stronger and we need to be louder.
Sure, we have some big wins – the Supreme Court’s decision that the Impact Assessment Act was unconstitutional being one – but we clearly have more work to do.
So please, sign this petition and join our effort to keep the federal government in its lane, and then pass this email on to every Canadian you know.
Together, we can make a difference.
Regards,
Josh Andrus
Executive Director
Project Confederation
Alberta
Thank the beetle and deadwood ‘fuel’ that should have been cleared
By Josh Andrus
Originally posted in the Western Standard
Parks Canada officials admit they failed to conduct controlled burns of dead pine trees, which now pose a significant fire risk.
While Ottawa fixates on climate change rhetoric, their neglect of forest fire prevention has left Alberta’s landscapes vulnerable to devastation.
Last week, a shining beacon of the beauty of our province was partially destroyed as a wildfire burned through the picturesque town of Jasper. Our thoughts and prayers go out to the victims.
Thankfully there has been no reported loss of life. But many people’s livelihoods have been wiped out. The question is how did this happen, and what could have been done to prevent it?
Smokey Bear’s famous saying was: “Only you can prevent forest fires.” And, in this case, proactive measures certainly could have made a difference.
Unfortunately, the entire federal government seems to have forgotten Smokey’s key point. Fire prevention on national park land is federal jurisdiction.
In 2022, Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault was informed that Parks Canada managers had not taken adequate precautions to protect the Town of Jasper from wildfires, according to documents obtained by Blacklock’s Reporter. At that time, Parks Canada officials admitted they had failed to conduct controlled burns of dead pine trees, which posed a significant fire risk.
“A mountain pine beetle infestation has brought significant changes to forests in Alberta, including Jasper National Park, with consequences for wildfire risk,” Guilbeault was informed.
Almost half of Jasper’s Whitebark Pine forest, 44%, was infected by beetles. However, few steps were taken to reduce the risk to the Town of Jasper with controlled burns of the surrounding forest, records show.
“Fire has not yet been applied for Whitebark Pine restoration,” stated a 2022 implementation report. “Mechanical thinning has been completed in 1.6 hectares, which is a small area relative to the amount of Whitebark Pine habitat.”
No reason was given for failing to take precautions. Since the fire, Guilbeault has made no public mention of the management reports.
Even though federal officials, including his department, knew the raging pine beetle was a serious hazard, Guilbeault blamed climate change: “As we are seeing in Canada and all around the world, we are seeing more and more aggressive forest fires,” he said on a media call on Monday.
Landon Shepherd, Incident Commander for Parks Canada, also attributed the intensity of the blazes to climate change: “This isn’t meant to be a discussion about climate change, but anyone who’s involved in fire management can tell you that things have become more difficult, especially in the last five years, to manage impacts.”
The 2022 warnings were not the first time concerns about a lack of fire prevention in national parks have been raised.
In 2018, CBC reported concerns from experts. Emile Begin and Ken Hodges, foresters for 40 years who had been studying Jasper National Park, found multiple issues with the forest that make it susceptible to a fire.
“You have fire suppression that has occurred for many years — therefore, you get a lot of dead fuel that would have been consumed by a natural process,” Hodges said. “The mountain pine beetle adds even more fuel to the situation.”
“You’ve got a major catastrophe on your hands if you get a match thrown into that.”
When pressed about the concerns, Alan Fehr, a superintendent for Jasper National Park, said: “We’re quite comfortable with where we are with our own emergency planning and evacuation planning.”
Hodges disagreed: “The potential that’s out there is actually scary. Hopefully, we’re wrong.”
Despite the repeated warnings of potential devastation due to forest management practices, Ottawa continues to point to climate change as the cause of the fires.
The Alberta government has been preparing, and increased its firefighting budget by more than 50% to $155.4 million this year. Alberta’s firefighting budget is now the highest it has ever been (despite misinformation about cuts.)
However, without proper fire prevention on national park land, blazes can become out of control quickly — as the warnings indicated.
Smokey Bear would be horrified. Clearly, Ottawa needs to spend less time interfering in provincial jurisdiction and more time focusing on things that actually are federal jurisdiction, like fire prevention in national parks.
Their inability to see the forest through the trees and take legitimate action to protect our national parks from the fury of an out-of-control wildfire demonstrates a degree of ineptitude that is, quite frankly, shocking.
Ottawa needs to stay in its lane and focus on its own jurisdiction, and they need to stop blaming climate change for their own ineptitude.
Alberta
As the RCMP throws up its hands, Alberta must have its own police
Originally posted in the Western Standard
By Josh Andus
Like the Canadian Armed Forces, the RCMP has a problem with recruitment. Writer Andrus argues that this makes it all the more urgent for Alberta to organize its own force
A recent report from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police’s independent Management Advisory Board had findings that are nothing short of alarming:
“Federal policing has now arrived at a critical juncture of its sustainability, which present risks for the national security and safety of Canada, its people, and its interests,” says the report.
After over a year of diligent study, the Board has been tirelessly firing off flares, signalling to all who will listen: the very foundation of our national public safety apparatus may be at risk of faltering. This is doubly problematic because, as you well know, the RCMP is also responsible for boots-on-the-ground policing in large parts of the country, including many rural and remote areas — including in Alberta.
Rural crime has been a longstanding issue in Alberta, and social disorder continues to make headlines nightly. Alberta Minister of Public Safety, Mike Ellis, took to social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter) to express his opinion:
“The independent report finds the RCMP has struggled in recent years to recruit and retain regular members, a problem that’s particularly acute in federal policing. This is not about the hard-working men and women on the frontline: they are doing everything they can. The reality is the RCMP do not have enough officers to police communities in Canada effectively.”
Ellis has been ahead of this story for months now.
In March, Ellis stated that: “… on average, Alberta has an RCMP officer vacancy rate of 20 per cent. This means that Alberta is only being served by 1,522 of the 1,911 RCMP officers that the federal government has authorized for Alberta.”
“Make no mistake, we are paying for these services that we aren’t receiving. Alberta’s taxpayers are paying tens of millions of dollars for nearly 400 vacant RCMP officer positions — for boots that are not on the ground.”
The consequences of this capacity crisis are far-reaching. Not only does it jeopardize the safety of Albertans, but it also undermines the credibility of Canada’s federal police force on the international stage.
With limited resources and personnel, the RCMP’s ability to address pressing national and global security concerns is severely compromised. The Management Advisory Board, created in 2019 by the federal government to provide external advice to the RCMP commissioner, set up a task force in the fall of 2022 to study the federal policing program.
Overall, the report says budget and personnel shortfalls have left the RCMP “operationally limited,” restricting the number of cases it can take on annually.
Here are some more highlights from the report:
- “Canada and its people have already begun to see the repercussions of the federal policing program being stretched thin.”
- “Federal policing’s overall eroding capacity may have implications for the credibility of Canada’s federal police force and its investigations on the international stage.”
- “Ultimately, this may influence Canada’s overall approach and standing in international politics, including its ability to advance global priorities.”
Clearly, we cannot afford to wait any longer. Municipalities can ease the burden on our national security services by establishing municipal policing.
Several cities in Alberta already have their own police authorities, and the provincial government is providing funding for others interested in exploring this option. Grande Prairie is already in the process of establishing their own municipal police service.
No word on how many other municipalities have taken the government up on their offer.
Unfortunately, President of Alberta Municipalities Tyler Gandam (also Mayor of Wetaskiwin) is featured prominently on the National Police Federation’s “Keep Alberta RCMP” website. Interestingly, the Keep Alberta RCMP website doesn’t mention the fact that the advisory board even exists.
It doesn’t mention the report. The notion that our federal policing infrastructure teeters on the brink of instability while Gandam appears to be asleep at the wheel, is deeply disconcerting.
The safety and security of Albertans must remain our top priority.
We cannot afford to wait any longer. The time has come for the province to take swift and decisive measures to bolster policing capabilities in Alberta.
It’s time for Alberta to seriously consider the establishment of an Alberta Provincial Police Service.
-
Alberta2 days ago
The Alberta energy transition you havenāt heard about
-
espionage2 days ago
Shock interview reveals big names connected to international paedophile network
-
Brownstone Institute2 days ago
Justice Is Served: Jay Bhattacharya Chosen to Be NIH Director
-
Business2 days ago
Green Energy or Green Grift? SDTC at the Center of a $38 Million Scandal
-
Alberta2 days ago
A Trump Effort To Revive Keystone XL Would Likely Be Purely Symbolic
-
Crime2 days ago
The Bureau Exclusive: The US Government Fentanyl Case Against China, Canada, Mexico
-
Daily Caller2 days ago
Celebrities Do Not Have The Political Star Power They Thought They Did
-
David Clinton23 hours ago
What Happens When Ministries Go Rogue?