Connect with us

Opinion

3 wards for the city based on federal and provincial governance models.

Published

3 minute read

An interesting proposal has been suggested for our municipal governance that is modeled after the provincial and federal electoral system.
Federally we have Members of Parliament (MPs) and one of them is also the Prime Minister. Provincially we have Members of the Legislature (MLAs) and one of them is also the Premier.
Federally our fine city is divided into 2 electoral districts or ridings both federally and provincially, so we have 2 MLAs and 2 MPs, and anyone could also be our Premier or Prime Minister, or Speaker, Cabinet Member, or Opposition Leader.
Back to our city’s governance, we elect 9 people currently, 8 councillors and 1 mayor for 1 electoral district. The idea being suggested is 3 wards, 3 councillors each with 1 also being the mayor.
Population wise and geographically 3 wards would be fairly easy. Using the last municipal census. Approximately 1/3 the population lives east of 30th Avenue so that would make an easy boundary and approximately 1/3 live north of the river, another easy boundary. The other 1/3 would be south of the river and west of 30th Avenue. Easy and already done.
Now, why would we consider 3 wards over governance of a single entity?
Look at thhe history of the wards, the services offered, crime rates, return on investments and you can see the reason.
The east of 30th Avenue ward has, 3 high schools with plans for 2 more, has the Collicutt centre with a recommended site for the next multi-use aquatic centre, 2 emergency services location, and a pickle ball court centre.
The north of the river ward has no high schools with no plans for any, the Dawe recreation centre, YMCA, and 1 emergency services centre.
The other ward has 1 high school, 1 college, downtown recreation centre, museum, tennis courts, Michener pool, Westerner, Kinex arenas, curling rinks, a proposed cultural centre, hospital, multiple emergency services to name but a few.
So it is easy to see the rationale behind and the appeal for a ward system as our city grows in a manner favourable to some and not to others. 3 wards with 3 councillors each and 1 of the 9 would also act as mayor. It works provincially and federally and it would make councillors responsible and accountable for any continued disparities, right?
It is an option. Just saying.

Follow Author

conflict

“HELL WILL RAIN DOWN”: Trump unleashes U.S. military on Yemeni Houthis

Published on

MXM logo MxM News

Quick Hit:

President Trump ordered a massive military assault on Iranian-backed Houthi forces in Yemen on Saturday, vowing to unleash “overwhelming lethal force” after months of attacks on American and allied vessels in the Red Sea.

Key Details:

  • Trump announced the strikes in a Truth Social post, stating, “Today, I have ordered the United States Military to launch decisive and powerful Military action against the Houthi terrorists in Yemen.”

  • He criticized former President Joe Biden for failing to contain the Houthis, saying his response was “pathetically weak” and emboldened the group’s ongoing attacks on commercial and military vessels.

  • The U.S. Navy’s USS Harry S. Truman carrier strike group, along with three destroyers and a cruiser, launched the assault, targeting radars, air defenses, and missile systems used to disrupt shipping lanes.

Diving Deeper:

President Trump escalated U.S. military action against Iran-backed Houthi rebels on Saturday, ordering airstrikes on targets in Yemen in response to the group’s repeated attacks on Red Sea shipping. Trump, in a Truth Social post, declared that the U.S. military would not tolerate continued aggression and vowed an overwhelming response.

“The Houthi attack on American vessels will not be tolerated,” Trump wrote. “We will use overwhelming lethal force until we have achieved our objective.” He directly warned the Houthis, stating, “YOUR TIME IS UP, AND YOUR ATTACKS MUST STOP, STARTING TODAY. IF THEY DON’T, HELL WILL RAIN DOWN UPON YOU LIKE NOTHING YOU HAVE EVER SEEN BEFORE!”

The strikes, carried out by U.S. Central Command, targeted missile sites, drone launch facilities, and command centers used by the Houthis to strike commercial and military vessels in the Red Sea. U.S. warships and carrier-based fighter jets participated in the mission, marking a significant escalation in efforts to protect international shipping routes.

Trump also issued a direct warning to Iran, demanding that its support for the Houthis “must end immediately.” Addressing Tehran, Trump wrote, “Do NOT threaten the American People, their President…or Worldwide shipping lanes. If you do, BEWARE, because America will hold you fully accountable and we won’t be nice about it!”

The strikes come after more than a year of escalating attacks by the Houthis, who have targeted over 100 merchant vessels, sunk at least two, and killed multiple sailors since the Israel-Hamas war began. Trump pointed to Biden’s failures in handling the crisis, noting that “it has been over a year since a U.S.-flagged commercial ship safely sailed through the Suez Canal, the Red Sea, or the Gulf of Aden.”

With Trump’s order, the U.S. is making clear that hostile actions in the Red Sea will not go unanswered. As military operations continue, all eyes will be on whether the Houthis and their Iranian backers heed the warning—or face even greater firepower from the U.S. military.

Continue Reading

Duane Rolheiser

Team Canada is driving us right into the arms of The Donald

Published on

Some day in the near future those of us who fondly remember the Canada that stretched from sea to sea, will look back to see how the best country in the world (at least for a while) fell apart.  In the end our love for national sporting endeavors and our multicultural charm couldn’t hold us together anymore.  Sure we may not have been able to define what a Canadian was, but for the longest time at least we could all agree we weren’t American.

At some point the country of Canada simply couldn’t support a decent living for the average citizen anymore.  Fiscally, it became inevitable that Canada would splinter and fall apart as desperate citizens made desperate political moves to do what immigrants have always done, uproot their lives in search of safety and financial security.

A number of serious academics will point to the first NAFTA agreement as the starting point for all this turmoil.  They might indicate NAFTA was Canada’s first Great Mistake. Tough to avoid even in hindsight.  Free Trade Agreements swept the planet and it would have been expensive and maybe even impossible to avoid that route.  Problem is, we were a small country surrounded by oceans and the biggest market in the world.  At first it looked like we were in the most enviable position of any country. Eventually we came to depend entirely on Big Brother next door and we didn’t aggressively pursue development and trade relationships with other countries and regions with the gusto that we could have and surely would have with better hindsight / foresight / intelligence.

It only took a few decades for our country to become entirely dependent.  One day Canadians woke up and realized we completely relied upon not just the US market, but the good graces of successive US governments who were perfectly happy to throw us a bone periodically to ensure at least limited success… until they weren’t.

The day we woke up and realized the water was rising all around us was very early on in the Trump 47 Presidency.  That’s when US voters decided their economy was off the rails. Their tax burdens were unsustainable. They were buying manufactured goods, including necessities like food, energy, microchips, and medicines from everywhere except the US. They were supporting economies actively engaged in the military / financial destruction of the US.  They spent far too much on their military and their bureaucracy, and funding for necessities at home were at risk.  In the end their reasons weren’t as important as their actions.  Their actions compelled Canada to do something and quick.

We didn’t. Instead of fighting like mad to build pipelines and move energy, to swiftly develop minerals the world needed stat, to immediately erase interprovincial trade and employment barriers, Canada fought the US.  Too many politicians and too many voters reacted the way most people do when they’re punched.  They punched back without stopping to think.

In retrospect it would have been a great time for someone with a wider view, someone that could have seen the world in 20 or 30 years time. Instead our politicians were focused on the oncoming political campaign.  Just like we could have used someone with foresight when we entered into NAFTA, it would have been incredibly helpful for the sea to sea version of Canada if politicians would have been leaders instead of vote collectors.  They might say this was Canada’s second Great Mistake.  We entered into a fight against a much larger and more powerful opponent. It was a fight we had no chance in winning. But our leaders weren’t interested in “saving” Canada so much as in “fighting for” Canada.  Turned out there was a big difference between “saving” Canada and “fighting for” Canada.  Who knew?  Retrospect.

As a side note, there were a couple of political leaders pushing for the longer view. Alberta’s Danielle Smith had some momentum, at least at first, in taking the fork toward resource development and even dealing with interprovincial trade barriers.  Saskatchewan’s Scott Moe was on side, but they were drowned out by Team Canada and were unable to form the political coalitions they needed to sway the fighting camp into the saving camp.  Federally there was one leader who took this route as well.  Max Bernier made the right calls, but unfortunately for his People’s Party only a couple of voters picked up the phone when he called. He was more less completely ignored.  It’s his own fault.  He called for immigration limits about 10 years too early and he was written off as a racist lunatic.  Remember those days? That’s what we did to just about everyone who stuck their necks up.

The problem for the “saving” Canada crew was that the “fighting for” Canada crew had all the major national political parties, all the corporate media (remember them?) and almost all the academics (or at least the ones the corporate media talked to).  Team Canada was at war and they acted like it. Even Canada’s greatest sporting hero of all time, Wayne Gretzky, fell to their blades.  When The Great One was sentenced to a lifetime of golfing in sunny Arizona / California / Florida and banished from visiting his national non-profit head office in wintery Ontario, well that was Canada’s third Great Mistake.  Those who saw the influence of Team Canada knew if they can cancel The Great One, they won’t think twice about your silly arguments for saving their nation.

So, Canadians voted to fight The Donald.  Early losses suffered by Ontario’s newly elected (to fight the tariffs with greater tariffs) Premier Doug Ford were not analyzed the way an intelligent individual might who was looking toward the future. Not a surprise as this forward looking type could not be found since the dawn of that NAFTA Agreement.  Canadian voters voted to follow the politicians who hated The Donald as much as they did.  Ironic because a lot of those voters ended up trying to continue that fight by joining the Democrat party a couple of years later.

In the end it wasn’t the tariff war that sunk the sea to sea Canada.  Canadians eventually got around to lowering trade barriers and even signed some significant deals with other nations that hated The Donald as much as they did. In the end though, the nations we wanted to deal with the most had no interest in what Canada has most to offer.

Do I need to say it?  Oil and Gas?  Cheap, reliable energy. It still hurts to talk about it.  Sure the Canadians who held on to the name of that formerly great country held a big party when they decided they were the world’s first Net Zero Nation.  They used paper cups and paper straws and paper plates and wooden forks to eat their organic cake.  All the public news services covered it.  People in the US might have even noticed if the remaining Canadians hadn’t decided to hold their event on July 4 so they could go head to head with.. oh forget it.

No it wasn’t the tariffs in the end. The tariffs were one of the battles in the war. The war ended for all intents and purposes when the people running sea to see Canada decided to take their longer vision of the future and apply it to the entire earth instead of the country they loved.  After all there would be no Canada at all if the world was too hot for life to continue.  So they continued to use reams of the dwindling supply of taxpayer dollars to subsidize what they were sure would be a world wide move to renewable energy sources. Problem is, they’re still looking for affordable battery technology.  Some say the greedy Americans actually discovered the science behind it but the oil and gas people bought it and buried it.  They’re going to be sorry when their coastal properties sink some day soon.  Rich pricks.

At least the remaining Canadians can feel good about saving the planet.

PS. Of course most of this can be avoided.  Canadians can still decide they love their country even more than they hate The Donald.  We could still direct ALL of our efforts into becoming as economically viable as possible.  But that would mean ending years of climate change crisis planning.  It would mean cutting the size and the scope of our bureaucracy to counter the wild advantages investors and businesses are building in the US. It would mean we’d come to the understanding that Saving Canada and Fighting For Canada have become 2 separate ideas.  It would mean taking this blow from the US on the cheek and turning that cheek to accept more blows while we focus ALL our attention on building a stronger nation as quickly as possible.  Not bloody likely, eh?

Continue Reading

Trending

X