Connect with us

COVID-19

Filipino lawmakers sound alarm over 290k excess deaths following COVID jab rollout

Published

12 months ago

5 minute read

From LifeSiteNews

By Angeline Tan

When vaccination against COVID began in 2021, the nation saw a 43% rise in its mortality rate, representing a massive uptick when compared to the 2% increase in the same rate between 2016 to 2020.

While governments worldwide generally seem to be glossing over the statistically significant excess deaths following the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, some lawmakers in the Philippines are now sounding the alarm.

In May 2024, a noteworthy hearing took place in the Philippines’ House of Representatives regarding the alarming rise of more than 290,000 excess deaths since the rollout of the experimental COVID vaccine. Explosive discussions followed, unveiling concerning data and testimonies, according to a Substack report by Aussie 17.

A substantial portion of the talks (which lasted over months) concentrated on the World Health Organization (WHO) Pandemic Agreement , with Congressman Dan S. Fernandez voicing fears about the binding  ramifications  of the WHO agreement upon the Philippines in terms of restrictive measures and compulsory medication.

In February of this year, Fernandez also noted that when vaccination against COVID began in 2021, the nation saw a 43% rise in its mortality rate, representing a massive uptick when compared to the 2% increase in the same rate between 2016 to 2020.

“It stands to reason that this very substantial increase in the number of deaths in 2021 could be attributed mainly to either two factors – to COVID-19 infection or to the vaccines themselves,” Fernandez asserted.

Strikingly, Fernandez admitted in remarks cited by Aussie 17:

We’ve been a part of that mistake because we approved the law that mandates the pharmaceutical to be responsible. And now we learn from that mistake.

Likewise, Attorney Tanya Lat declared:

There are Filipino people who are sick and tired of how the DOH (Department of Health) has let us down, has refused to admit that people are dying, turning a blind eye to the people who are getting sick, turbo cancers, myocarditis, children who are suddenly sick as if they are 60, 70-year-old people.

Adding, Lat said:

We look into their eyes, there does not seem to be any sympathy for the people who have died, for the people who are now physically disabled because of these vaccines.

Moreover, analyst Sally Clark revealed worrying data on declining birth rates, saying:

This is our birth data. And it shows that we have had a loss of babies every single year since the pandemic has started. So 2019 was our last normal birth year. And the last line at the bottom is 2023.

The very big spike is the deaths in 2021, which started in March of 2021, immediately consecutive with the start of the vaccine rollout.

Clark underscored that the significant increase in deaths during July and August 2021 coincided with the introduction of the Johnson & Johnso vaccine.

In 2021, when vaccination rolled out, the deaths went up in all age groups that were vaccinated.

Alluding to proposed amendments to the WHO Pandemic Treaty, Congressman Alonto Adiong lamented:

If we continue on this track we are surrendering to a fascist establishment! Because all of these things without asking individual states whether they agree or not through these amendments? It’s fascism for me! It’s a clear basic definition of fascism!

Adiong separately pointed out the lack of accountability on the part of global pharmaceutical companies:

There’s really an agreement that indicates that they cannot be sued. So I mean, that’s something that we should worry about. Why would a pharmaceutical company insist on not being sued if there will be injuries or fatalities that may come after as a result of that?

While lawmakers in the Philippines are slowly beginning to rethink their policy of pushing the experimental COVID shots onto an unsuspecting populace, other countries, including the United States, have continued to invest in the “vaccine” production of pharmaceutical companies.

On July 2, Moderna announced that the U.S. government had earmarked US$176 million to be given to the Big Pharma giant to facilitate the development of its bird flu vaccine, Channel News Asia reported.

Funds from the U.S. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority will be set aside to complete late-stage development and testing of a pre-pandemic mRNA-based “vaccine” against H5N1 avian influenza, Moderna elaborated.

Related Topics:

Todayville is a digital media and technology company. We profile unique stories and events in our community. Register and promote your community event for free.

Follow Author

More from this author
Business / 5 hours ago

RFK Jr. says Hep B vaccine is linked to 1,135% higher autism rate

International / 5 hours ago

RFK Jr. tells Tucker how Big Pharma uses ‘perverse incentives’ to get vaccines approved

Censorship Industrial Complex / 6 hours ago

Global media alliance colluded with foreign nations to crush free speech in America: House report

COVID-19

New Peer-Reviewed Study Affirms COVID Vaccines Reduce Fertility

Published on July 1, 2025

By

Here’s what the numbers reveal, and what it could mean for humanity

What was once dismissed as a “conspiracy theory” now has hard data behind it.

A new peer-reviewed study out of the Czech Republic has uncovered a disturbing trend: in 2022, women vaccinated against COVID-19 had 33% FEWER successful conceptions per 1,000 women compared to those who were unvaccinated.

A “successful conception” means a pregnancy that led to a live birth nine months later.

The study wasn’t small. It analyzed data from 1.3 million women aged 18 to 39.

Here’s what the numbers reveal, and what it could mean for humanity.

First, let’s talk about the study.

It was published by Manniche and colleagues in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, a legitimate, peer-reviewed journal respected for its focus on patient safety and pharmacovigilance.

The study was conducted from January 2021 to December 2023 and examined 1.3 million women aged 18–39. By the end of 2021, approximately 70% of them had received at least one COVID-19 vaccination, with 96% of the vaccinated cohort having received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine.

By 2022, a stark difference was clear.

The vaccinated cohort averaged around 4 successful conceptions per 1,000 women per month.

That’s a staggering 33% LESS than the 6 per 1,000 seen in the unvaccinated group.

This means that for every 2 vaccinated women who successfully conceived and delivered a baby, 3 unvaccinated women did the same.

In 2022, unvaccinated women were 1.5 times MORE likely to have a successful conception.

Again, that’s a conception that led to a live birth nine months later.

The authors did not jump to the conclusion that their study proved causation. They cited that other factors may have played a role, such as self-selection bias

However, the researchers noted that self-selection bias does not explain the timing and scale of the observed drop in fertility.

Moreover, birth rates in the Czech Republic dropped from 1.83 per 1,000 women in 2021 to 1.37 in 2024, adding further evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines may be contributing to the decline in fertility.

That downward trend, the researchers argue, supports the hypothesis that something beyond individual decision-making may be affecting conception rates.

As such, they argue that the study’s results warrant a closer and more thorough examination of the impact of mass vaccination.

If this study holds true, and vaccinated women are really much less likely to have successful conceptions, the implications for humanity are massive.

Millions of babies could be missing each year as a result of COVID vaccination, and recent data from Europe and beyond already point to a deeply disturbing trend.

NOTE: Europe experienced a sharper decline in births than usual from 2021 to 2023.

Live births fell from 4.09 million in 2021 to 3.67 million in 2023, marking a 10.3% decline in just two years.

The new Czech study adds to growing evidence that COVID vaccines may be contributing to a dramatic decline in fertility, just as many feared all along.

As Elon Musk warns, “If there are no humans, there’s no humanity.”

Whether the shots are the cause or not, the trend is real—and it’s accelerating.

It’s time to stop dismissing the signals and start investigating the cause.

Thanks for reading. I hope this report gave you real value. This is a critically important topic that deserves attention.

If you appreciate my work and want to help keep it going, consider becoming a paid subscriber.

99% of readers get this content for free. But just $5/month from the 1% keeps it flowing for everyone else.

If this work matters to you, this is the best way to support it.

Be the 1% who makes it possible.

Catch the rest of today’s biggest headlines at VigilantFox.com.

See More Stories

Continue Reading

COVID-19

Ontario man launches new challenge against province’s latest attempt to ban free expression on roadside billboards

Published on June 30, 2025

By

Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that Ontario resident George Katerberg has launched a legal challenge against the Ontario Ministry of Transportation for banning roadside billboards with social or political messages. Mr. Katerberg believes that the Ministry’s policies go too far and undermine the freedom of expression of all Ontarians.

This case goes back to March 2024, when Mr. Katerberg, a retired HVAC technician, rented a billboard on Highway 17 near Thessalon, Ontario, that featured images of public health officials and politicians alongside a message critical of their statements about vaccines.

After the Ministry rejected his proposed billboard several times on the grounds it promoted hatred, a constitutional challenge was launched with lawyers provided by the Justice Centre. Mr. Katerberg’s lawyers argued that the Ministry’s position was unreasonable, and that it did not balance Charter rights with the purposes of relevant legislation.

The Ministry later admitted that the sign did not violate hate speech guidelines and agreed to reconsider erecting the billboard.

However, in April 2025, the Ministry quietly amended its policy manual to restrict signs along “bush highways” to those only promoting goods, services, or authorized community events.

The new guidelines are sweeping and comprehensive, barring any messaging that the Ministry claims could “demean, denigrate, or disparage one or more identifiable persons, groups of persons, firms, organizations, industrial or commercial activities, professions, entities, products or services…”

Relying on this new policy, the Ministry once again denied Mr. Katerberg’s revised billboard.

Constitutional lawyer Chris Fleury explains, “By amending the Highway Corridor Management Manual to effectively prohibit signage that promotes political and social causes, the Ministry of Transportation has turned Mr. Katerberg’s fight to raise his sign into a fight on behalf of all Ontarians who wish to express support for a political or social cause.”

No date has yet been assigned for a hearing on this matter.

Continue Reading

Trending

X